-
Reusser holds lead as Vollering wins in Tour de France hills
-
Disney profits top estimates on strength in theme park business
-
Argentina's Albornoz hit with four-game ban for 'intimidatory' referee abuse
-
LIV Golf CEO says funding secured to play beyond 2026
-
Guatemala volcano eruption eases off, but alert remains in place
-
Stocks stall tracking earnings, oil dips on Iran-Oman Hormuz move
-
Baby hippo descended from Escobar's herd rescued in Colombia
-
Tuipulotu to lead New Zealand in South African tour opener
-
Woman arrested after four men stabbed in central London
-
Leftist Democrat urges unity after victory in Michigan
-
Celtic boss O'Neill in hospital after 'small procedure'
-
Austria, Slovakia hit new temperature records
-
Israeli forces raid Palestinian refugee camp near Jerusalem
-
Where mountain lions roam, fewer deer in the headlights
-
Explosive drone found near Ukrainian plane at German airport
-
Alonso hails 'emotional' Mudryk return in 1-0 loss to Juventus
-
Leftist Democrat wins stunning primary victory in crucial Michigan
-
Embattled FIFA chief Infantino in emergency talks, suffers Figo blow
-
Inter Milan and AC Milan battle to 1-1 draw in Perth friendly
-
Mudryk back for Chelsea in friendly defeat to Juventus
-
Butterflies seek new habitats as climate changes: study
-
Alarm as explosive drone found near Ukrainian plane at German airport
-
'Deceitful' Infantino 'must go' says Luis Figo
-
Infantino and the failed deal affair -- What they said
-
नूशा ऑबेल: क्या वह पॉट्सडैम की समस्याओं से निपटने के लिए तैयार हैं?
-
努莎·奧貝爾:她能否應對波茨坦面臨的問題?
-
누샤 오벨: 그녀가 포츠담의 문제들을 해결할 수 있을까?
-
ヌーシャ・オーベル:彼女はポツダムの抱える問題に対処できるのか?
-
Нооша Аубель: Чи зможе вона впоратися з проблемами Потсдама?
-
Нооша Аубель: Сможет ли она справиться с проблемами Потсдама?
-
Noosha Aubel: Is she up to the task of tackling Potsdam’s problems?
-
Stocks mostly rise tracking earnings, US-Iran hopes
-
Alarm at German airport after drone found near Ukrainian plane, mid-air incident
-
Pakistan team reaches base camp with body of renowned climber killed in avalanche
-
Salah arrives in Turkey for Trabzonspor talks
-
Ceuta warns of 'unsustainable' situation for child migrants after influx
-
Embattled FIFA chief Infantino holds emergency talks with directors
-
SpaceX rocket stage believed to have slammed into Moon
-
Russian barrage on Kyiv kills 17 as Ukraine fails to down single missile
-
India monsoon floods, landslides kill more than 100 since July: officials
-
'Lost': Migrants despair after Britain expels them back to France
-
South Korea pro baseball league cancels games over heatwave
-
Cathay Pacific's profit soars 71% despite Iran war driving up fuel costs
-
Taiwan probes 17 China-funded firms over high-tech talent poaching
-
Russian barrage on Ukraine kills 15, wounds dozens more
-
Trump warns Iran to open Hormuz or get 'hit very hard'
-
South Korea police raid Starbucks HQ over 'Tank Day' fiasco
-
Factories shed workers in Bangladesh garment sector
-
Tech back in fashion as Asian markets extend rebound
-
North Korea warns of 'military options' over Japan rearmament
US Supreme Court strikes down constitutional right to abortion
The US Supreme Court on Friday ended the right to abortion in a seismic ruling that shreds half a century of constitutional protections on one of the most divisive and bitterly fought issues in American political life.
The conservative-dominated court overturned the landmark 1973 "Roe v Wade" decision that enshrined a woman's right to an abortion, saying that individual states can now permit or restrict the procedure themselves.
"The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives," the court said.
In the majority opinion, Justice Samuel Alito said "abortion presents a profound moral issue on which Americans hold sharply conflicting views.
"The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion," he said.
Dissenting were the three liberals on the court.
The ruling will likely set into motion a cavalcade of new laws in roughly half of the 50 US states that will severely restrict or outright ban and criminalize abortions, forcing women to travel long distances to states that still permit the procedure.
The opinion shredded the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling by the nation's highest court that said women had the right to abortion based on the constitutional right to privacy over their own bodies.
Alito's opinion largely mirrors his draft opinion that was the subject of an extraordinary leak in early May, sparking demonstrations around the country and tightened security at the court in downtown Washington.
Barricades have been erected around the court to keep back the protesters gathered outside -- after an armed man was arrested on June 8 near the home of conservative justice Brett Kavanaugh.
The court's ruling goes against an international trend of easing abortion laws, including in such countries as Ireland, Argentina, Mexico and Colombia where the Catholic Church continues to wield considerable influence.
- Victory for religious right -
It represents a victory of 50 years of struggle against abortion by the religious right but the anti-abortion camp is expected to continue to push for an outright nationwide ban.
The ruling was made possible by the nomination of three conservative justices to the court by former Republican president Donald Trump -- Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.
The case before the court was a Mississippi law that would restrict abortion to 15 weeks but during the hearing of the case in December several justices indicated they were prepared to go further.
According to the Guttmacher Institute, 13 states have adopted so-called "trigger laws" that will ban abortion following the move by the Supreme Court.
Ten others have pre-1973 laws that could go into force or legislation that would ban abortion after six weeks, before many women even know they are pregnant.
Women living in states with strict anti-abortion laws will either have to continue with their pregnancy, undergo a clandestine abortion or obtain abortion pills, or travel to another state where the procedure remains legal.
Several Democratic-ruled states, anticipating an influx, have taken steps to facilitate abortion and clinics have also shifted their resources.
Travel is expensive, however, and abortion rights groups say abortion restrictions will severely impact poor women, many of whom are Black or Hispanic.
M.Odermatt--BTB