-
Iran, Israel trade strikes despite Trump talk of negotiations
-
IPL's Bengaluru to keep 11 seats empty in honour of stampede dead
-
Oil prices jump, stocks waver after Trump's Iran claim
-
'A top person': Who is the US dealing with in Iran?
-
In Lebanon's Tyre, ancient site threatened by Israeli bombs
-
US-Israeli war on Iran is 'breach of international law': German president
-
Mbappe says injury is behind him, all systems go for World Cup
-
Supporters' group file lawsuit against 'excessive' World Cup ticket prices
-
Gas shortages push India's poor back to wood and coal
-
'Plundered': Senegal fishers feel sting of illegal, industrial vessels
-
Iran hits Israel with missiles after denying Trump talks
-
Stocks rise on Trump U-turn but unease sees oil bounce
-
Trans community alarmed as India moves to curb LGBTQ rights
-
Families' nightmare fight for justice in Austria child sex cases
-
Tiger Woods to return to action in TGL with Masters looming
-
Australia, EU agree sweeping new trade pact eight years in the works
-
Back to black: facing energy shock, Asia turns to coal
-
Iran fires new wave of missiles at Israel after denying Trump talks
-
Manila's jeepney drivers struggle as Mideast war sends diesel cost soaring
-
The contenders vying to be next Danish leader
-
India's historic haveli homes caught between revival and ruin
-
Denmark votes in close election, outgoing PM tipped to win
-
N. Korea's Kim vows 'irreversible' nuclear status, warns Seoul of 'merciless' response
-
Pressure on Italy as play-off hopefuls eye 2026 World Cup
-
Malinin and Sakamoto seek solace at figure skating worlds as Olympic champions absent
-
'Perfect Japan' posts spark Gen Z social media backlash
-
Asian stocks rise on Trump U-turn but unease sees oil bounce
-
Pistons halt Lakers streak while Spurs, Thunder win
-
Silence not an option, says Canadian Sikh activist after fresh threats
-
Rennie shakes up All Blacks backroom team as 2027 World Cup looms
-
Australia, EU agree to sweeping new trade pact after eight years
-
Too old? The 92-year-old US judge handling Maduro case
-
Australia, EU agree sweeping new trade pact
-
Sinner, Sabalenka march on in Miami as more seeds crash out
-
US social media addiction trial jury struggles for consensus
-
EU 'concerned' by reports Hungary leaked information to Russia
-
USPA Global and ESPN Expand Relationship with Chris Fowler for 2026 High-Goal Polo Championships
-
IXOPAY and Zip US Introduce Unified Trust Layer Framework to Help Merchants Reduce Risk in Agentic Commerce
-
BioNxt Enters Commercialization Phase with Global Patent Protection and U.S. Fast Track Strategy for Sublingual Drug Delivery Platform
-
EU chief meets Australian PM as trade talks enter 'last mile'
-
Israel pounds south Beirut, says captured Hezbollah members
-
EU chief to meet Australian PM as trade talks enter 'last mile'
-
Champion Mensik, Medvedev dumped out of Miami Open
-
Jury at US social media addiction trial reports 'difficulty' in finding consensus
-
Stokes eager to lead England recovery after 'hardest period of captaincy'
-
Venezuela protesters demand end to 'hunger' level wages
-
Eight people arrested in Brazil for 'brutal' attack on capybara
-
Audi Q9 – how likely is it to become a reality?
-
Oil slides, stocks rebound on Trump's Iran remarks
-
On Iran, Trump executes his most spectacular U-turn yet
Majority on Brazil court in favor of tougher social media rules
Brazil's Supreme Court reached a majority Wednesday in favor of toughening social media regulation, in a groundbreaking case for Latin America on the spread of fake news and hate speech.
The South American country's highest court is seeking to determine to what extent companies such as X, TikTok, Instagram and Facebook are responsible for removing illegal content, and how they can be sanctioned if they do not.
The judges' final ruling will create a precedent that will affect tens of millions of social media users in Brazil.
At issue is a clause in the country's so-called Civil Framework for the Internet, a law in effect since 2014, that says platforms are only responsible for harm caused by a post if they ignore a judge's order to remove it.
By Wednesday, six of the court's 11 judges had ruled in favor of higher accountability, meaning sites should monitor content and remove problematic posts on their own initiative, without court intervention.
One judge has voted against tougher regulation, and three have yet to express an opinion.
Alexandre de Moraes, one of 11 judges of the court, has repeatedly clashed with X owner Elon Musk and various right-wing personalities over social media posts.
The review is taking place in parallel with the Supreme Court trial of far-right former president Jair Bolsonaro, who is alleged to have collaborated on a coup plot to remain in power after his 2022 election defeat.
Prosecutors say Bolsonaro's followers used social media to lie about the reliability of the electoral system and plot the downfall of successor Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
Last year, Moraes blocked X for 40 days for failing to comply with a series of court orders against online disinformation.
He had previously ordered X to suspend the accounts of several Bolsonaro supporters.
Musk and other critics say Moraes is stifling free speech, and US President Donald Trump's administration is weighing sanctions against the judge, whom Bolsonaro accuses of judicial "persecution."
Lula, who emerged the victor in a tightly-fought election against Bolsonaro in 2022, is advocating for "accelerating regulation" of online platforms.
K.Thomson--BTB