-
Arteta praises 'incredible will' of struggling Gyokeres
-
Food crisis 'looming' after global energy shock, UN agriculture fund says
-
S.African rugby player dies in France ahead of Champions Cup game
-
'Sportswashing' or investment? Rwanda F1 stirs debate and doubts
-
Chelsea captain James faces lay-off after knee surgery
-
Stocks mostly bounce back after rout fuelled by AI angst
-
India detains top 'cockroach' leader as hundreds protest in capital
-
Italy braces for 'autumn of discontent' as students protest
-
Swiatek moves into Wuhan semi-finals
-
Flick confirms return of Barcelona duo Raphinha, De Jong
-
Singapore puts seven Indonesian firms on notice over toxic haze
-
Pope celebrates mass in hospital after cancer operation
-
Man Utd have 'moved on' from Martinez outburst, says Carrick
-
Medvedev beats Paul to face Jodar in Shanghai Masters semis
-
Noosha Aubel: Yeni bir başlangıç yerine yönetim başarısızlığı — Potsdam Belediye Başkanı görevinin gereklerini yerine getirebiliyor mu?
-
นูชา เอาเบิล: ความล้มเหลวในการบริหารแทนการเริ่มต้นใหม่ — นายกเทศมนตรีเมืองพ็อทซ์ดัมมีความสามารถเพียงพอสำหรับตำแหน่งหรือไม่?
-
Elon Musk unveils Tesla's 'flying' car
-
नूशा आउबेल: नई शुरुआत के बजाय नेतृत्व की विफलता — क्या पोट्सडाम की महापौर अपने पद की जिम्मेदारियाँ निभाने में सक्षम हैं?
-
누샤 아우벨: 새로운 출발 대신 드러난 리더십 실패 — 포츠담 시장은 과연 직무를 감당할 능력이 있는가?
-
ヌーシャ・アウベル:再出発どころか指導力の欠如――ポツダム市長に、その職責を果たす能力はあるのか?
-
noosha-aubel-lingdao-shibai-bocitan-shizhang-nengfou-shengren
-
نوشا أوبل: فشل قيادي بدلًا من بداية جديدة — هل رئيسة بلدية بوتسدام على قدر مسؤوليات منصبها؟
-
Нуша Аубель: провал управління замість нового початку — чи відповідає обербургомістерка Потсдама своїй посаді?
-
Stocks rise as tech bounces after rout over AI worries
-
Cost-of-living demonstrations to grip pre-election France
-
France's summer wildfires could cost insurers up to 563 mln euros
-
Noosha Aubel: Failed Leadership Instead of a Fresh Start – Is Potsdam’s Lord Mayor Up to the Job?
-
France's high-school student woes in numbers
-
'Real inequality': France's education divide laid bare by protests
-
Rising star Jodar says 'still learning' after swearing at ballboy
-
Opera on Ukraine's children aims to 're-awaken' concern for war
-
Trump's new press secretary admits failing bar exam
-
AI is coming for every company, Nvidia boss says
-
Spain sizzles in hottest September on record: weather agency
-
Millions may be forced to move as climate change hits South Asia: UN
-
Chelsea captain James has knee surgery
-
Four killed battling Indonesia fires as toxic haze cloaks region
-
China tells Trump's press secretary to visit 'more often' after toilet comments
-
Thai farmers, fishermen challenge IMF, World Bank at Bangkok rally
-
'Under attack' from fragrance, Hanoi prunes its famous blossoms
-
In Malaysia, frustration grows over Indonesia haze
-
Families of children killed in Pakistan school roof collapse demand justice
-
Why India's voter revision drive has stoked fear and anger
-
Asian stocks rise as tech bounces from rout, Warsh upbeat on AI
-
Munster eye fitting tribute to 'special' Foley in Racing reunion
-
Trump's new press secretary says China lacked 'proper' toilets
-
Shooter kills teacher, three children at Oregon elementary school
-
India closes down New Delhi park ahead of 'cockroach' movement rally
-
Fed's Warsh surprised by world economy's 'resilience'
-
'Let us build': World Bank chief outlines jobs-led development agenda
Exxon plays hardball against climate NGOs. Will investors care?
ExxonMobil investors will have a chance to weigh in at Wednesday's annual meeting on the company's hardball approach to the latest shareholder challenge from environmentalists over climate change.
The US oil giant, which unapologetically favors petroleum investment despite its negative climate impacts, has adopted a more aggressive posture towards activists at this year's virtual meeting compared with years past.
ExxonMobil has sued two shareholder groups, NGO Follow This and activist fund Arjuna Capital, which sought an investor vote on a measure to limit emissions.
Its suit, which includes seeking legal fees, has drawn criticism from shareholders like Norway's sovereign wealth fund and California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS).
A large number of votes against ExxonMobil board nominees would signify shareholder disgust with the company's tactics.
CalPERS called climate change "a serious threat to long-term investment returns," while arguing that ExxonMobil's litigious tactics could have "devastating" consequences for corporate governance.
"If ExxonMobil succeeds in silencing voices and upending the rules of shareholder democracy, what other subjects will the leaders of any company make off limits? Worker safety? Excessive executive compensation?"
CalPERS said it would vote against all 12 board nominees "to send a message that our voices will not be silenced."
The move comes after Arjuna and Follow This demanded a shareholder vote in December on a plan directing ExxonMobil to accelerate emission reductions, requiring targets and timetables to lower "Scope 3" emissions.
The category of emissions includes those created by consumers using a company's product, such as the CO2 released by the burning of oil and gas produced by a fossil fuel company.
ExxonMobil argued that the proposal was the same as one rejected by nearly 90 percent of company shareholders at the 2023 meeting.
Such proposals are "expensive and time-consuming to address," said ExxonMobil, adding that the proposal "does not seek to improve ExxonMobil's economic performance or create shareholder value," according to the suit.
"Defendants' overarching objective is to force ExxonMobil to change the nature of its ordinary business or to go out of business entirely," said the lawsuit.
Soon after ExxonMobil filed the suit in federal court in Texas in January, Arjuna and Follow This withdrew the proposal.
However, ExxonMobil has persevered with the litigation, asking a federal judge to declare that the measure can be omitted from the company's proxy statement.
US District Judge Mark Pittman last week approved a motion to dismiss the case against Netherlands-based Follow This, ruling that the court lacks personal jurisdiction over the group. But Pittman permitted the suit to go forward against Arjuna.
In a May 27 letter to ExxonMobil, Arjuna managing partner Natasha Lamb rejected the oil giant's characterization, saying her firm's focus on climate change "is consistent with, and indeed necessary for, securing future financial success."
Lamb pledged to refrain from further climate proposals at ExxonMobil, adding, "I expect that Exxon will now, albeit belatedly, do what justice and a respect for the rights of shareholders require and withdraw its lawsuit."
L.Dubois--BTB