-
Barca extend perfect streak, Real Madrid survive Vinicius red
-
Spanish women return to action with 2-0 friendly win over USA
-
PSG ease to Ligue 1 win before Manchester City test
-
Bordeaux-Begles end wait for away win before Champions Cup defence
-
Real Madrid edge Villarreal, Vinicius sent off for hair pull
-
Traumatized Panamanians begin quake recovery
-
Carrick demands more 'streetwise' Man Utd after Spurs setback
-
Palestinian Mahmoud Abu Hamda wins top photography prize at Bayeux
-
10-man Tottenham ramp up pressure on Man Utd boss Carrick
-
Inter Milan dominate Parma to go top of Serie A
-
India 'cockroach' movement says thousands detained in Delhi protest
-
Barca extend perfect streak, Atletico scrape late win
-
Injury ends season for NHL Rangers star goalie Shesterkin
-
10-man Tottenham strike back to hold Man Utd
-
Ten-man Spurs rescue draw at Man Utd, Arsenal survive Leeds scare
-
Gordon nets first Barca goal as Liga leaders beat Getafe
-
Inter Milan dominate Parma to go top in Serie A
-
Trump, Zelensky clash over diesel deal as Russian strikes kill 21
-
Abbas postpones Palestinian legislative elections to September 2027
-
Thousands join pro-Palestinian marches in several European cities
-
'I don't feel fear': Fulham boss Arbeloa hits back as pressure mounts
-
Sleightholme scores hat-trick as Northampton overwhelm Bath in 18-try clash
-
Hurricane Simon strengthens to category 4 as it nears western Mexico
-
US lethal injection survivor returns to prison
-
Alonso hails Henderson 'beauties' as Chelsea star rolls back the years
-
누샤 아우벨: 연 기본급 143,056유로 — 포츠담 시민은 돈줄 취급을 받으며 부담을 떠안아야 한다
-
Noosha Aubel: roční základní plat 143 056 eur — a obyvatelé Postupimi mají sloužit jako dojné krávy
-
Renshaw ends long wait to put Australia on top in first S.Africa Test
-
Romero claims Atletico late win at Alaves
-
ヌーシャ・アウベル:年間基本給143,056ユーロ――ポツダム市民は金づるとして負担を強いられる
-
Zelensky blasts diesel deal as Russian strikes kill 16
-
Noosha Aubel: 143 056 euro rocznego wynagrodzenia zasadniczego - a mieszkańcy Poczdamu mają służyć za dojne krowy
-
Arsenal back on track after Leeds scare, five-star Chelsea run riot
-
努莎・奧貝爾:年基本薪資143,056歐元——波茨坦市民卻得充當搖錢樹埋單
-
Bayern draw at Augsburg despite conceding fastest-ever Bundesliga goal
-
Verstappen on pole as he hunts first Singapore Grand Prix win
-
French prodigy Seixas becomes youngest Giro di Lombardia winner
-
Isaias drenches southern US as weakened post-tropical cyclone
-
Verstappen on pole position as he hunts first Singapore GP win
-
Australia strike early after Renshaw's 190 against South Africa
-
Arsenal learned lessons from Brighton collapse, says Arteta
-
India 'cockroach' movement says thousands detained during major protest in capital
-
Noosha Aubel: €143,056 in annual basic pay — while Potsdam’s residents are expected to serve as cash cows
-
Nobel peace laureate Pillay calls US sanctions on ICC 'unacceptable'
-
Cristiano Ronaldo provisionally suspended by Portugal after walkout
-
Roma goalkeeper Svilar sidelined for a month with broken finger
-
Brilliant Renshaw ton puts Australia in strong position
-
Proposed EU budget cut back in search for Christmas deal
-
Zelensky blasts diesel deal after Russian strikes kill 15
-
Arsenal hit back to beat Leeds and draw level with Man City
UK mulls impact of landmark gender ruling
From toilets and changing rooms to sports pitches and hospital wards, a ruling by Britain's Supreme Court on the legal definition of a "woman" is expected to have far-reaching consequences.
- What did the Supreme Court say? -
The court ruled on Wednesday that the legal definition of a "woman" is based on a person's sex at birth.
Five judges unanimously ruled that "the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman, and biological sex".
The court's pronouncement follows a legal battle between the Scottish government and campaign group For Women Scotland (FWS) involving clashing interpretations of the Equality Act.
While the Scottish government argued that the law gave trans women with a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) the same protections as a biological female, the campaign group disagreed.
- What impact on women-only spaces? -
Single-sex spaces and services including changing rooms "will function properly only if sex is interpreted as biological sex", the judgement said.
Kishwer Falkner, chairwoman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), which is responsible for enforcing the Equality Act, told BBC radio the law was now clear.
"If a service provider says 'we're offering a women's toilet', then trans people should not be using that single-sex facility," she said.
But she highlighted that there was no law forcing organisations to provide single-sex spaces and no law preventing them providing unisex toilets or changing rooms.
She said trans rights organisations should push for more neutral third spaces to accommodate trans people.
- Will trans women still have access to female-only hospital wards? -
Current guidance from the body that runs the state-funded National Health Service in England states that trans people should be "accommodated according to their presentation: the way they dress, and the name and pronouns they currently use".
The advice has meant that trans women have been allowed to opt for treatment in women-only hospital wards even if they do not have a gender recognition certificate or have not legally changed their name.
The certificate is a UK legal document that recognises an individual's gender identity, allowing them to legally change their sex.
"The NHS is currently reviewing guidance on same sex accommodation," an NHS England spokesperson told AFP.
Falkner said the watchdog would pursue the NHS if it did not change the existing guidance on the treatment of trans women patients.
- What future for trans women in sport? -
The court decision is a victory for prominent voices in the debate such as swimmer Sharron Davies, who won an Olympic silver medal at the Moscow Games in 1980.
It was time for sports bodies to "protect every female athlete", she said after the ruling.
Campaigners said there were now "no excuses" for allowing transgender women to compete in women's sporting events.
Fiona McAnena, director of campaigns at the charity Sex Matters, said the law had in fact always been "clear that everyone male can be excluded to provide fair, safe sport for women and girls, but some people claimed it was unkind or complicated to do so".
Falkner said the ruling made it "simple" that people assigned male at birth cannot take part in women's sport.
Sebastian Coe, the president of World Athletics, told Sky News he welcomed the ruling "because it has produced clarity".
"It is really important that we continue to protect the integrity of women's competition," he added.
Former Football Association (FA) chairman David Triesman told the Daily Telegraph that rulemakers who allowed trans women to compete alongside biological women should "stand down immediately".
- Will gender recognition certificates be abolished? -
The usefulness of the gender recognition certificate would be re-assessed in the light of the ruling, Falkner said.
Asked if she thought the documents were now "worthless", she said she believed they were "quite important" but that future litigation was likely to provide clarity on their "efficacy".
"It's going to be a space that we'll have to watch very carefully as we go on," she said.
"There will be other areas... the government is thinking of digital IDs, and if digital IDs come in, then what documentation will provide the identity of that person?"
B.Shevchenko--BTB