-
Bad COP, worse COP? EU tempers hopes for UN climate summit
-
Dodgers beat Braves to advance, Guardians survive in MLB playoffs
-
Rookie Henry named in Wallabies midfield to face All Blacks
-
Latin American, Caribbean women top Nobel literature buzz
-
Housing crisis set to dominate Spain's snap election
-
US says Fiji-based Chinese official paid bribes for Beijing
-
Gas, health care, utilities: high costs squeeze US midterm voters
-
After botched US execution, Christa Pike was nearly taken off life support
-
New Zealand Rugby seeks injunction over PNG Chiefs name
-
Guinea-Bissau junta urges military unit loyal to ex-president to disarm
-
Samsung expects 780% quarterly operating profit jump on AI boom
-
As species decline, green turtles offer glimmer of hope
-
Guardians survive with 9-3 win over White Sox
-
Brothers Scott and Beauden Barrett named to start for All Blacks
-
Saudi Arabia says 3 dead at airports after Houthis claim attacks
-
EU trade chief seeks to dial down China tensions
-
Stocks slide as oil sees volatile trading day over Iran war fears
-
'Never again Bolsonaro': thousands march ahead of Brazil election runoff
-
Microsoft pushes AI vision with new, expensive Surface laptop
-
After botched execution, US woman was nearly taken off life support before revival
-
Five children among 28 killed in Russian strikes on Ukraine
-
Searing AIDS drama 'Elsinore' opens London film festival
-
Odell Beckham Jr signs with Minnesota Vikings
-
Evicted pensioner who sparked Spain housing protests dies: tenant union
-
Saudi Arabia says three dead at airports after Houthis claim attacks
-
Golf star Rahm quitting LIV tour over 'unacceptable' terms
-
Trump plans to turn Florida golf course into presidential retreat
-
Thousands march fearing return of a Bolsonaro presidency in Brazil
-
WHO says cannot conduct full risk assessment on Russia plague reports
-
French PM denies police ordered to confront student protesters
-
After botched execution, US woman is awake and shackled to bed
-
Rubio touts US power, calls on Europe to emerge from 'slumber'
-
New Zealand fly-half Mo'unga ruled out of Australia Tests
-
Trump says 'we don't think' Russian plague is bio-weapon
-
Protests in major Turkish city after mayor defects to Erdogan party
-
Five children among 26 killed in Ukraine after Russian strikes
-
Climate change strips island's title of largest penguin colony: study
-
Man City should 'accept' punishment for rule breaches, says Lineker
-
Rubio says West must choose between national power or decline
-
US woman who survived botched execution is awake and speaking
-
Russia's plague scare: What we know
-
From 1800s to modern pharma: a Nobel-winning chemistry quest
-
French luxury giant to fund redevelopment of two Paris streets: city hall
-
Southampton boss Eckert given suspended ban over 'Spygate'
-
Trump wants to turn Florida golf course into presidential retreat
-
Russia warns of 'false' information as second plague case reported
-
Mayor of Turkish opposition stronghold defects to Erdogan party
-
IEA ready to release more oil reserves if necessary
-
Children among heavy casualties in Ukraine after Russian strikes
-
HSBC 'consults' over UK unit job cuts amid AI adoption
UK court rules Apple abused App Store dominance
Apple lost a UK lawsuit Thursday which accuses the US tech giant of abusing the dominant position of its App Store, with claimants seeking more than £1.5 billion ($2 billion) in damages.
The Competition Appeal Tribunal found that Apple shut out competition in the app distribution market and charged app developers "excessive and unfair" commissions.
Apple said it "strongly disagrees" with the ruling and intends to appeal.
The case was brought by King's College London academic Rachael Kent and the law firm Hausfeld & Co on behalf of millions of UK iPhone and iPad users.
Under UK law, in this type of class action, all potentially affected persons are included in the procedure by default, and may benefit from possible compensation, unless they voluntarily opt out.
In the trial, which opened in January, claimants argued that Apple users were overcharged by the company "due to its ban on rival app store platforms."
They said a 30-percent surcharge that the company "imposes" on apps purchased through Apple's App Store leads to consumers "paying more."
At the heart of the claimants' case was that Apple used the App Store to exclude competitors, forcing users to use its system and boosting profits in the process.
Apple, which had denounced the trial as "baseless", maintained that its App Store "faces vigorous competition from many other platforms."
O.Lorenz--BTB