-
Split loyalties for Indian football fans at Brazil friendly
-
Antonelli tops times in final practice at Bahrain GP
-
India-Pakistan blockbuster brings cricket fever to Japan baseball field
-
Gauff digs deep to beat Osorio in China Open second round
-
Wong waiting on Rafa after winning Asian Games tennis gold
-
Fresh protests to hit Spain after housing measures defeated
-
With Russia next door and rising costs, Latvia goes to the polls
-
'He's here with me': Japan cycle queen dedicates gold to late brother
-
Penalty hero rues empty seats as Games hosts Japan win football gold
-
Japan Olympic chief says 'lot more' athletes at Games than expected
-
North Korea fires ballistic missile after Seoul's apology demand
-
Asian carmakers besting US rivals at home, China poised to strike
-
US regulator finds Boeing 737 MAX software bug 'not a safety concern'
-
Widgets & Web Offers All-Inclusive Investor Relations Websites for Public Companies, IPOs and SPACs
-
Ohtani 'managing' injuries as Dodgers launch MLB post-season
-
Adams named new US captain to 2030 World Cup
-
Botched US execution leaves murderer unconscious on ventilator: lawyers
-
China a better influence in Latin America than US: poll
-
Cornell rape case exposes sexual violence at US colleges
-
Judge pauses construction of border project in Texas national park
-
France held by Italy in Zidane's homecoming after Olise stunner
-
Belgium's De Bruyne fires double to sink Turkey, France held by Italy
-
Ethiopian pro-government militia claims Tigray airport as regional tensions spike
-
US jobs data boosts stocks as oil prices dip
-
Ohtani shaking off injuries as Dodgers launch MLB post-season
-
US Supreme Court to hear high-stakes climate case
-
Sea levels to rise in California as coastal wave surges up west coast
-
Trump expected to name intel chief Clayton as AI czar: reports
-
New rallies urged in France as protests disrupt over 730 schools
-
Argentina unveils passports-for-investment scheme
-
Djokovic survives China Open scare, Sabalenka starts strong
-
Brazil election debate chaos sparks censorship row
-
King Charles to evoke colonial 'darkest days' on Caribbean tour
-
England's Carse charged by cricket body over nightclub incident
-
Tesla shares jump after global car sales top estimates
-
Amazon vows $1 bn for data center towns, decries 'myths'
-
DR Congo Ebola outbreak killed more than 4,000: official figures
-
Oil prices drop on G7 fuel release, US jobs data boosts stocks
-
Djokovic survives China Open scare against wildcard world no. 104
-
G7 agrees deal to ease global energy supply concerns
-
Lula, Bolsonaro trade blows in final scramble for votes in Brazil
-
Spain's government dealt blow as lawmakers reject housing bills
-
New clashes erupt as protests disrupt over 560 French schools
-
Food, medicine shortages deepen in Russian-occupied Oleshky
-
NY governor vows to close loophole after alleged Cornell gang rape
-
Man City whistleblower Rui Pinto facing 'dire consequences' - lawyers
-
Ethiopia Tigray rebels pushed back as regional tensions spike
-
Russia 'tearing Kyiv apart', mayor says, as strikes paralyse traffic
-
Stocks rise, yields fall as US job numbers disappoint
-
Taiwan boxer Lin wins Games gold as Japan edge North Korea on penalties
US to remove warnings from menopause hormone therapy
The US health regulatory agency on Monday said it would direct manufacturers to remove a bold warning on many hormone therapies used to alleviate menopausal symptoms, saying the risks have been exaggerated.
Hormone Replacement Therapy can be taken to replace estrogen that the body stops producing during menopause -- the natural process that ends female reproductive years -- with the aim of alleviating symptoms that can be physically and mentally debilitating including hot flashes, brain fog, insomnia, night sweats, joint pain and bone loss.
It once was used routinely, but a major 2002 study that was aimed at exploring how the therapies could prevent chronic disease pointed to risks associated with specific HRT formulations.
Since then "black box warnings" -- the strongest warning the US Food and Drug Administration can require on prescription drugs -- have sounded alarm over increased HRT risks including of certain cancers, cardiovascular conditions and probable dementia.
Prescription and use of the therapies over recent decades plummeted.
But the matter remains one of debate, and critics have pointed to flaws with the early-2000s study, whose trials were halted as risks appeared: namely it focused on women who were on average a decade-post menopause and in their 60s, when cardiovascular risks increase regardless.
Today guidance generally indicates that newly menopausal or perimenopausal women -- broadly in their late 40s or 50s -- are potential candidates for treatment.
There also are newer, more localized or lower-dose forms of the therapies available.
"We're challenging outdated thinking and recommitting to evidence-based medicine that empowers rather than restricts," US health chief Robert F. Kennedy Jr said in introducing the measure.
- More nuance -
Many members of the medical community have urged revisiting the label, which they say can scare women for whom benefits may outweigh risks.
Others have voiced concern that changes shouldn't come without a transparent review process that convenes independent experts.
FDA head Marty Makary dismissed that notion in a Monday briefing, saying such committees are "bureaucratic, long, often conflicted and very expensive.
"People have felt demoralized in this field. We've made almost no progress in assessing the evidence for years."
FDA officials have emphasized the new label will provide for more nuanced discussion between patients and doctors in evaluating whether HRT can be right for individuals.
Typically women in a low-risk category have healthy vitals including weight and blood pressure as well as normal-range cholesterol levels, with no history or a lower risk of developing breast cancer. They are also within the first 10 years of beginning menopause.
The president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Steven Fleischman, commended the FDA's move, saying "the updated labels will better allow patients and clinicians to engage in a shared decision-making process."
Fleischman said in a statement the change would not shift the ACOG's guidance on estrogen therapy, but noted it was important to distinguish between systemic estrogen products -- including methods taken orally or via patches -- and low-dose vaginal estrogen.
"Like all medications, systemic estrogen products are not without risk, and their use should be based on an individualized conversation between patients and their clinicians," the health association said.
The FDA said it is not seeking to remove the boxed warning for endometrial cancer for systemic estrogen-alone products.
D.Schneider--BTB