-
'We shut up big mouths,' says South Africa's World Cup coach Broos
-
Brazil advance at World Cup, history for South Africa, Canada, Bosnia
-
Mothers search, men weep amid debris of Venezuela quakes
-
Confirmation still a rite of passage in Denmark but less Christian
-
South Africa stun South Korea to make World Cup history
-
Seoul stocks soar in Asia tech rally after Micron blowout forecast
-
Clarke fears Scotland 'probably going home' after Brazil World Cup loss
-
Moriyasu vows Japan will play to win and top group against Sweden
-
Secret cameras, mics and AI reveal rare Cambodia wildlife
-
Beloved spiritual utopia under threat in Modi's India
-
Bulgaria's milk farmers falter in former yogurt empire
-
Ancelotti hails Vinicius as Brazil march on at World Cup
-
Trump opens US 250th birthday party with rally-style speech
-
Morocco have 'ingredients' of World Cup winners, says coach Ouahbi
-
TotalEnergies awaits ruling in high-stakes climate trial
-
'Master key' vaccine technique may 'prevent next pandemic': researchers
-
Spice Girls' debut 'Wannabe' turns 30, amid reunion talk
-
Curacao belong on World Cup stage, says Advocaat
-
Nagelsmann feels Germany 'punished' for topping World Cup group
-
Morocco overcome historic Haiti goals to roll into World Cup last 32
-
Bosnia beat Qatar to reach World Cup knockout stages for first time
-
Twin earthquakes in Venezuela destroy buildings, sow panic
-
Brazil advance at World Cup as Swiss, Canada reach last 32
-
Vinicius Junior sparkles as Brazil beat Scots to reach World Cup last 32
-
Morocco overcome historic Haiti goals to maintain World Cup momentum
-
Two powerful earthquakes strike Venezuela, destroying buildings
-
ICC judges sue Trump over 'draconian' sanctions
-
Australia teen social media ban has little impact: research
-
Space shuttle ready for new mission in California
-
Modigliani nude sets European record at London auction
-
Tunisia coach Renard demands pride in final World Cup outing
-
Trump seeks $88 bn in extra funding, mostly for Iran war
-
Switzerland, Canada advance as Brazil eye last 32
-
Wyatt-Hodge stars as England ease into Women's T20 World Cup semi-finals
-
Bosnia in strong position to reach last 32, Qatar out of World Cup
-
Switzerland down World Cup co-hosts Canada to top Group B, both progress
-
Brent falls below $75 as Nasdaq drops for 3rd straight day
-
'New rules': life in world epicentre of jihadist terror
-
Korda chases 3rd straight major at Women's PGA Championship
-
Trump clashes with Republicans in testy Capitol visit
-
Zimbabwe Senate approves bill to extend presidential term
-
Scheffler says PGA Tour headed 'in right direction' with two-tier system
-
Pulisic fitness boost as US seek knockout momentum against Turkey
-
Mamdani-backed leftist candidates win New York Democratic primaries
-
Hantavirus outbreak should formally end on July 2: WHO
-
Britain's Draper continues promising start under Andy Murray
-
Hong Kong arrests two for allegedly selling 'seditious' material
-
Laporte wary of Uruguay will to avoid World Cup exit against Spain
-
US promises to protect Gulf states' interests in Iran talks
-
Major Nigeria police reform edges forward with senate approval
Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
Could a sudden drop in pollution from cargo vessels criss-crossing global shipping lanes be inadvertently making the world hotter?
The main reason for global warming is the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.
But scientists have been looking at the extent to which a shift to cleaner, lower-sulphur shipping fuels in 2020 may have fuelled warming by reducing the amount of particles in the atmosphere that reflect heat back into space.
This theory surfaced again when January was declared the hottest on record, extending a streak of exceptional global temperatures that has persisted since mid-2023.
- Why did shipping emissions drop? -
On January 1, 2020, the sulphur content in engine fuel used to power container vessels, oil tankers and other ships in global trade was slashed by decree from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent.
This was mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the global shipping sector, including its environmental impact.
Sulphur oxides in fuels are tiny airborne particles harmful to human health and linked to strokes and the development of lung and cardiovascular diseases.
Some jurisdictions have even tighter restrictions in so-called "emissions control areas" in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the North American zone and the US marine Caribbean area.
- Is it working? -
The IMO estimated its fuel mandate would cut emissions of sulphur oxide by 8.5 million tonnes a year.
Last June, research published in the academic journal Earth System Science Data reported that sulphur oxide emissions from the shipping industry declined 7.4 million tonnes between 2019 and 2020.
The IMO said that in 2023 just two vessels flagged for inspection were found to be using fuel with a sulphur level above the 0.5 percent requirement.
Since the new regulation came into force, only 67 violations have been recorded.
- Is there a link to global warming? -
Sulphur oxides are not greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane which are effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures.
On the contrary, they boost the reflectivity of clouds by making them more mirror-like and capable of bouncing incoming heat from the Sun back into space.
The sudden decline in these particles may have spurred recent warming "but we can't quantify it in an ultra-precise manner", said Olivier Boucher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)
He said studies had detected changes in clouds above major shipping lanes since 2020, including a greater presence of larger particles less reflective of sunlight.
Scientists could say shipping emissions had aided warming to some degree "but we are not able to say that it contributes a lot", Boucher added.
One study published in August in the journal Earth's Future concluded that the IMO regulation could increase global surface temperatures by nearly 0.05 degrees Celsius a year up until 2029.
The drastic reduction in airborne sulphur pollution helps to explain the exceptional heat of 2023 but the authors said the magnitude of the temperature extremes meant other factors were likely also at play.
H.Seidel--BTB