-
Alan Greenspan: longtime Fed chief with a divided legacy
-
Leinster boss Cullen to step down at end of next season
-
'Has-been' Belgium stars scorched after Iran World Cup draw
-
Oil falls on US-Iran progress; pound holds up as Starmer resigns
-
Starmer resigns as UK PM, Burnham favourite to take over
-
France, Germany reach deal on arms maker KNDS, paving way for IPO
-
Latest developments on Europe's heatwave
-
France set for hottest day yet of heatwave
-
Keir Starmer: downfall of UK's unpopular PM
-
Gaza's surfers seek solace in the sea
-
MEXC Lists Arcium (ARX) with 70,000 USDT in Airdrop+ Rewards
-
EasyJet rejects £5 bn takeover offer from US equity firm
-
Europe scorched by latest heatwave
-
Mediators hail 'progress' in US-Iran talks after lengthy opening session
-
UK's Starmer resigns as prime minister
-
Coffee break: Starbucks Korea stores pause for training after 'Tank Day' fiasco
-
Rightist leaders congratulate Colombian president-elect
-
Rare Philippine school shooting kills three teens, wounds seven
-
Kenya labour minister accused over Russian forced recruitment
-
Crude prices drop after 'positive' US-Iran talks
-
Some France schools closed for day of searing heat
-
Tuchel's England face defensive questions despite flying start at World Cup
-
Frankfurt to All Blacks: New Zealand pick first German-born player
-
Not just a hideout: Sahel forests provide base for jihadists
-
Ageless Messi has World Cup scoring record in his sights
-
Africa faces child surgery crisis as key anaesthesia runs out
-
Trump-backed populist wins razor-tight Colombia vote, sparking protests
-
J-Bay: S.Africa's surf mecca missing out on the global tour
-
'Progress', say mediators, after Iran-US talks towards ending war
-
Key points from the first round of Iran-US talks
-
European countries close schools, cancel trains as heatwave set to intensify
-
Crude prices drop, most stocks rise on 'positive' US-Iran talks
-
'Progress', say mediators, after Iran-US talks on ending war
-
Slimy beans: Japanese natto disgusts and delights the world
-
Clark wins despite hecklers but hopes not to be 'heel of the PGA'
-
Cape Verde targeting World Cup knockout rounds after Uruguay draw: coach
-
Father's Day near-miss at US Open brings Burns to tears
-
New coach Rennie names Savea as All Blacks captain
-
Scheffler praises Clark's resolve in gutsy US Open triumph
-
Yamal kickstarts Spain World Cup bid as Cape Verde stun Uruguay
-
Cape Verde fight back for second World Cup draw against Uruguay
-
Leggett Dynamics Launches Mid-Class Massage System & Makes Luxury Comfort Accessible on High-Volume Programs
-
EcoModular Advances EIC STEP Scale Up Application to Support European Manufacturing Expansion
-
Ore Energy and Budget Thuis to Deploy 1 GWh of Multi-Day Iron-Air Energy Storage in a First for European Energy Suppliers
-
Mexican fans rally behind Iran as 'our second team' at World Cup
-
Iran-US talks to continue through the night
-
Trump-backed candidate wins razor-tight Colombia presidential election
-
Clark edges Burns by one stroke for second US Open title
-
Iran coach hails 'great achievement' after second World Cup draw
-
Curacao firmly on the map after World Cup heroics
Study links major polluters to big climate damages bill
The economic cost of carbon emissions is far higher than previously estimated, said a new study Wednesday that links big polluters to tens of trillions of dollars in climate-related damages worldwide.
The study in the journal Nature measures how human-caused warming affects economic growth and assigns a share of global damages to specific emitters -- from major economies to oil giants.
The findings land as a growing wave of lawsuits seek to hold fossil fuel producers and other carbon-heavy businesses accountable for climate "loss and damage".
Claimants argue that large polluters are legally liable for their outsized contribution to climate change and its associated extreme weather events, particularly in poorer nations.
This study did not seek to answer the "legal and ethical" question of compensation, said Marshall Burke, a professor at Stanford University and the study's lead author.
"Our goal was first and foremost scientific, but we hope to contribute to the broader policy discussion of how to measure loss and damage and what to do about it," Burke told AFP.
It does offer "guidance" on the scale of potential costs and a framework "for estimating how specific emissions from specific emitters at specific points in time lead to damages" worldwide, he added.
They assessed the impact of rising temperatures on economic factors including labour productivity and agriculture, but also some associated climate-driven weather extremes.
US emissions between 1990 and 2020 were the largest source of estimated global damages at $10.2 trillion followed by China ($8.7 trillion) and the European Union ($6.4 trillion).
Emissions linked to Saudi oil giant Saudi Aramco between 1988 and 2015 resulted in $3 trillion in cumulative global economic damages by 2020, the study also said.
- Settling debts -
But the authors found the largest share of climate damages lies ahead.
"We were surprised not only by the overall magnitude of estimated damages, which are in the tens of trillions of dollars, but also by how much larger future damages from past emissions are than past damages from past emissions," Burke said.
One tonne of C02 emitted in 1990 caused about $180 in global damages by 2020, but was expected to inflict a further $1,840 through 2100 -- roughly 10 times more than the costs already incurred.
This is because CO2 has a long lifespan, lingering in the atmosphere where it contributes to warming for decades to come.
For this reason "settling debts for past damages will not settle debts for past emissions", the authors wrote.
Even under relatively conservative assumptions, the cost per tonne of carbon emitted is far higher than many government estimates.
The research also highlights how high-emitting activities such as air travel contribute to future damage. Taking a long-haul flight each year over a decade, for example, could generate around $25,000 in losses by 2100.
As emissions rise and poorer nations bear the brunt, wealthy countries and fossil fuel businesses are facing mounting scrutiny over their disproportionate role in driving climate damage.
Last year, a separate Nature study found extreme heat linked to emissions from 111 fossil fuel companies caused $28 trillion in global economic losses between 1991 and 2020.
Companies have long argued it is impossible to attribute harm from a global problem to any single emitter, and courts have been cautious about awarding compensation.
E.Schubert--BTB