-
Bodies hanging from bridge revive violence in once-calm town in Mexico
-
Iran Guards say won't reopen Hormuz without US meeting Tehran's demands
-
Lionel Messi bids farewell to father who guided his glittering career
-
Hogh's hat-trick inspires Celtic to 5-1 victory over Kilmarnock
-
Raul Fernandez wins British MotoGP Grand Prix
-
London grants first licences for supervised Uber robotaxis
-
Tesla FSD secrecy puts Europe’s safety oversight under scrutiny
-
Erasmus hopeful Kolisi hamstring injury not 'too bad'
-
Mercedes-AMG GT 53 balances speed, range and daily usability
-
Luxury car buyers trade prestige for mainstream value
-
Lion queen Werro focused on Euro medal, not 800m world record
-
Students, teachers mourn girl killed in Thailand school shooting
-
Changan uses FILDA 2026 to accelerate its African expansion
-
Jacobson to lead New Zealand for first time against Sharks
-
Honda plots a profitable European comeback without a price war
-
Typhoon Dolphin makes landfall in China after flight cancellations, evacuations
-
Iran Guards say won't reopen Hormuz without US meeting all Tehran's conditions
-
South Korea FA apologises after sex scandal adds to controversies
-
Messi absent after father's death as Miami lose in Leagues Cup
-
Indonesia closes national park as wildfire spreads
-
Flight cancellations, evacuations in China as Typhoon Dolphin looms
-
ZXMoto leads China's charge to dominate the global motorbike market
-
Iran issues demands for reopening of Hormuz
-
Top-ranked Sabalenka, Pegula stunned in Toronto fourth round
-
Afghanistan's gold rush upends lives and landscapes
-
Japan nuclear debate unnerves proponents of pacifism
-
Messi missing after father's death as Miami lose in Leagues Cup
-
Spanish teen Jodar ousts eighth seed Lehecka at Montreal
-
World number one Sabalenka ousted in Toronto by Alexandrova
-
Angers mounts in US over vast network of car license plate cams
-
Olympic weightlifter hoists debris for Venezuela earthquake recovery
-
Darderi to face Nakashima in Montreal quarter-finals
-
FIFA condemns 'concerted and ongoing effort' to weaken Infantino
-
Espresso power fires Darderi past Borges in Montreal
-
South Africa win after surviving late Argentina surge
-
Shnaider upsets Pegula to book Toronto quarter-final with Swiatek
-
Man Utd boss Carrick being 'careful' with Mount as Man Utd draw with PSG
-
Mount injury overshadows Man Utd draw with Paris Saint-Germain
-
All Black Tuipulotu surprised after Sharks include Nonu
-
Ukraine denies targeting Bulgaria as drone explodes near pipeline
-
Infantino denies allegations of affair, favouritism while at UEFA: report
-
Vollering grabs Tour de France lead in Nice
-
MotoGP leader Martin soars to victory in British GP sprint race
-
Euros to showcase new TV guidelines on non-sexualisation of women athletes
Study links major polluters to big climate damages bill
The economic cost of carbon emissions is far higher than previously estimated, said a new study Wednesday that links big polluters to tens of trillions of dollars in climate-related damages worldwide.
The study in the journal Nature measures how human-caused warming affects economic growth and assigns a share of global damages to specific emitters -- from major economies to oil giants.
The findings land as a growing wave of lawsuits seek to hold fossil fuel producers and other carbon-heavy businesses accountable for climate "loss and damage".
Claimants argue that large polluters are legally liable for their outsized contribution to climate change and its associated extreme weather events, particularly in poorer nations.
This study did not seek to answer the "legal and ethical" question of compensation, said Marshall Burke, a professor at Stanford University and the study's lead author.
"Our goal was first and foremost scientific, but we hope to contribute to the broader policy discussion of how to measure loss and damage and what to do about it," Burke told AFP.
It does offer "guidance" on the scale of potential costs and a framework "for estimating how specific emissions from specific emitters at specific points in time lead to damages" worldwide, he added.
They assessed the impact of rising temperatures on economic factors including labour productivity and agriculture, but also some associated climate-driven weather extremes.
US emissions between 1990 and 2020 were the largest source of estimated global damages at $10.2 trillion followed by China ($8.7 trillion) and the European Union ($6.4 trillion).
Emissions linked to Saudi oil giant Saudi Aramco between 1988 and 2015 resulted in $3 trillion in cumulative global economic damages by 2020, the study also said.
- Settling debts -
But the authors found the largest share of climate damages lies ahead.
"We were surprised not only by the overall magnitude of estimated damages, which are in the tens of trillions of dollars, but also by how much larger future damages from past emissions are than past damages from past emissions," Burke said.
One tonne of C02 emitted in 1990 caused about $180 in global damages by 2020, but was expected to inflict a further $1,840 through 2100 -- roughly 10 times more than the costs already incurred.
This is because CO2 has a long lifespan, lingering in the atmosphere where it contributes to warming for decades to come.
For this reason "settling debts for past damages will not settle debts for past emissions", the authors wrote.
Even under relatively conservative assumptions, the cost per tonne of carbon emitted is far higher than many government estimates.
The research also highlights how high-emitting activities such as air travel contribute to future damage. Taking a long-haul flight each year over a decade, for example, could generate around $25,000 in losses by 2100.
As emissions rise and poorer nations bear the brunt, wealthy countries and fossil fuel businesses are facing mounting scrutiny over their disproportionate role in driving climate damage.
Last year, a separate Nature study found extreme heat linked to emissions from 111 fossil fuel companies caused $28 trillion in global economic losses between 1991 and 2020.
Companies have long argued it is impossible to attribute harm from a global problem to any single emitter, and courts have been cautious about awarding compensation.
E.Schubert--BTB