-
Brazil football clubs face massive sponsorship blow from betting ban
-
West Bank's violent settlers part of a new generation fuelled by ideology
-
ChatGPT maker wants to be the App Store for AI as safety concerns grow
-
US-led coalition ends mission in Iraq
-
Women fight fires and sexism in Indonesian Borneo
-
Pope-backed White Sox join Braves with MLB playoff wins
-
Forsling's OT blast lifts Florida over Carolina in NHL opener
-
NBA close to picking new $12-13bn Vegas team owners: report
-
Hurricane Polo sweeps over Mexico's Pacific coast, heads inland
-
LA28 Olympics torch relay to visit all 50 states
-
Grynspan pulls ahead in race to lead UN: diplomat
-
Spain brush aside Croatia in Nations League, England down Czechs
-
Trump touts AI boss pledge to self-regulate
-
Trump hails 'morally binding' AI self-regulation pledge
-
Oil down, but stocks lower as bond yields rise
-
Yamal inspires Spain to Croatia romp on World Cup homecoming
-
England break down stubborn Czechs to claim first Nations League win
-
UN to hold fourth informal poll of secretary-general candidates
-
UN Security Council extends Haiti anti-gang force by 6 months
-
Who are the Emiratis behind crisis-hit Manchester City?
-
Manchester City guilty of Premier League charges: What comes next?
-
Singer Angelique Kidjo urges Africans to 'create together'
-
Man City chief Soriano slams Premier League 'conspiracy theory'
-
Alleged Rihanna mansion shooter mentally fit for trial, says judge
-
Hurricane Polo sweeps over Mexico's Pacific coast
-
Mystery over UK airbase scare as police find petrol not explosives
-
Man City must be relegated after guilty verdict says club's former chairman
-
OpenAI unveils low-cost AI model, a day after shelving Astra upgrade
-
German far-right aims to lead Saxony-Anhalt govt in December
-
Premier League confirms Man City guilty of serious financial breaches
-
Little damage as Hurricane Polo sweeps over Mexico's Pacific coast
-
Brazil's Lula turns to Bad Bunny tune to criticise Trump ahead of polls
-
Manchester City guilty of breaking financial rules - Premier League
-
Nigerian dancer eyes world record after seven-day marathon
-
FIFA boss Infantino blasted as would-be 'emperor' by UEFA's Ceferin
-
Swiss regulator concludes Julius Baer bank probe
-
Stocks move lower despite oil prices dropping
-
Brazil's patron saint pulled into latest election scrap
-
AI driving up innovation investment: UN
-
Football overload leaves players near 'breaking point', warns Tebas
-
UN Security Council extends Haiti mission by 6 months
-
Paris Eiffel Tower says chief to step down after uproar over removing women staff
-
Man Utd do not deserve medals if Man City stripped of titles: Rooney
-
Amaze Holdings (NYSE: AMZE) Executes Binding LOI to Acquire BullionFX | Alchemy, a Decentralized Gold-Backed Financial Ecosystem for Valued at US$155 Million
-
Vana Completes Expanded Staking as Part of the Vega Upgrade, Publishes Expanded VANA Token Economics
-
Clashes between French teens, police as school blockades intensify
-
Spain to cap gas price hikes, extend fuel discounts
-
Stocks move sideways despite oil moving lower
-
'We just need rain': Germany's Rhine river hits new low
-
African leaders to gather in Egypt for business summit
'Shocking' UK reality TV show retraces refugee journeys
Britain's newest reality TV show has been slammed as "insensitive", "voyeuristic" and even "nauseating" for recreating with six Britons the often fatal journeys made by thousands of refugees to the UK.
Bluntly titled "Go Back to Where You Came From", the part-documentary, part-reality TV show by Channel 4 follows the group of six, who hold strong views both for and against immigration.
They are divided into two teams, with one dropped into one war-ravaged Raqqa in Syria and the other sent to Mogadishu in Somalia.
Over four episodes which launched on February 3, they "experience some of the most perilous parts of the refugee journeys" according to Channel 4 -- although they travel largely in armoured vehicles.
The outspoken views of some participants, as well as the show's format, have been criticised by viewers, charities and some media.
Amnesty International UK called it "deeply disappointing" and "sensational".
Participant and chef Dave Marshall, 35, opens the series standing on the cliffs of Dover, calling for immigrants crossing the Channel to be "blown up".
Moments later, political commentator Chloe Dobbs, 24, says that unless immigration is reined in "Britain will be a hellhole full of people wearing burqas".
In the first episode, the six are taken to markets where they meet families, play football with kids and accompany them as they search through litter for scraps.
At one point, when they visit a bombed-out family home in Raqqa, Marshall and two others are invited to stay the night.
"Very kind of you for offering your house to us," replied Marshall, the irony perhaps lost on him.
"The series explores the varied and sometimes polarised opinions in our society in a fresh way," a series spokesperson said.
In upcoming episodes, both groups undertake "challenges", including a boat crossing and trekking through a Libyan desert. There is no winner of the series though.
- 'Outrageous opinions' -
The reality TV genre "exists and its success depends on actually performing shocking opinions", said Myria Georgiou, media and communications professor at the London School of Economics.
"I'm sure the contestants are competing for that shock element -- who is going to be more extreme in their opinions," Georgiou told AFP.
Dobbs defended it as a "really fun show that lots of people will tune into".
"More so than just some bog-standard, boring documentary," she said.
"Go Back to Where You Came From" is based on a popular Australian series which first ran in the early 2010s.
At around that time, politicians in Australia were campaigning to "stop the boats" of irregular migrants reaching the country.
A decade later, the same catchphrase has been seized upon by politicians opposing asylum seekers crossing the Channel to reach Britain.
The timing of the British version did not surprise Georgiou.
"You have the political leadership, nationally and globally, that have made the most outrageous opinions mainstream," said Georgiou.
"We can see that politics have become entertainment and thus it's no surprise that entertainment has become politics."
Some viewers have praised Channel 4 for giving a rare primetime spot to the hot-button immigration debate, with British charity Refugee Council "welcoming" the show's premise.
"Television shows have huge potential to highlight the human stories behind the headlines," Refugee Council CEO Enver Solomon said.
- 'Humanitarian tragedy' -
In one heavily criticised "challenge", the group get into a dinghy in a simulation of the often fatal Channel crossings.
For Dobbs, who has previously said small boats were made out to be "fun" by some refugees, getting into a flimsy vessel in the middle of the night was a turning point.
"It was that moment for me that it really hit me. Gosh, people must be really desperate to get on these boats," she acknowledged.
However, clips of the simulation sparked outrage across the Channel, with French politician Xavier Bertrand calling for the "nauseating" show to be cancelled.
"Hundreds of people have died in the Channel in recent years. This situation is a humanitarian tragedy, not the subject of a game," Bertrand said on X.
The number of asylum seekers arriving in Britain on small boats after crossing the Channel rose to more than 36,800 in 2024, according to official data.
It was also the deadliest year for migrant crossings, with at least 76 deaths recorded.
According to Dobbs, the show wanted to do something "different".
"Rather than just talking to a migrant about what the boat crossing they did was like, wouldn't it be even better to simulate it and feel all those emotions for yourself?"
"And if it makes it more entertaining and more intriguing for the audience and means that more people tune in, I mean, that's a win-win," Dobbs added.
F.Müller--BTB