-
Nike plans job cuts as it forecasts lower sales
-
Portugal win without Ronaldo as Klopp's Germany get first victory
-
Ireland game interrupted twice by Gaza protests
-
Wemby: 'Very sad' to see players endorse betting firms
-
Judge denies acquittal bid by US woman who killed her kids
-
Manchester City Women scrape draw with Real Madrid
-
Klopp averts crisis with first win as Germany boss
-
India, Australia and Pakistan in same World Cup group
-
A saintly spat and debate snub: Brazil enters final campaign stretch
-
Daryz's hopes of repeat Arc win boosted by draw
-
US tells European allies to act 'immediately' to lower diesel prices
-
Steelers ship disgruntled defender Porter to Cowboys
-
G20 trade ministers fail to see consensus against overproduction
-
Klopp gets first win as Germany boss
-
Portugal edge Denmark in Ronaldo's absence
-
Bolivia's attorney general arrested on drugs, money laundering charges
-
US stocks edge higher as bond yields retreat for now
-
Raiders host Chiefs in battle of unbeaten division rivals
-
US tells European allies to 'immediately' act to lower diesel prices
-
Lowest Fee Bitcoin ATMs Announces Launch of More Than 400 ATMs Nationwide
-
Trump vows to hit Iran 'very hard' if linked to flydubai attack
-
G20 against 'weaponization' of food trade: French minister
-
Williams leaves Spain camp with thigh knock
-
Female US inmate in critical condition after botched execution
-
WTA reduces 2027 schedule for world's top 50
-
Spotlight on UK-UAE ties amid Manchester City scandal
-
US says 'in Europe's best interest' to cooperate on fuel supply
-
Ethiopia and Eritrea break diplomatic ties over conflict
-
Rogue OpenAI agents covered up their tracks, report says
-
Downing Street says Manchester City not 'above the rules'
-
A saintly spat and debate snub: Brazil enters final polls stretch
-
Hadjar wants to 'fight for the title' from next season
-
Zidane 'no regrets' about Materazzi headbutt as France face Italy again
-
Bolivia's attorney general arrested for alleged drug trafficking, money laundering
-
Libya's pay strike rallies teachers across divided nation
-
German sugar tax sparks new government row
-
Four-member crew blasts off for International Space Station
-
Musk returns to US government for Pentagon war study
-
i-payout Expands True Local Payment Capabilities to Help Enterprises Pay Recipients Globally
-
Stocks slide as bond yields spike
-
Botched US execution prompts global calls to scrap death penalty
-
Thousands rally as EU chief urges respect for Kosovo war crimes court
-
Algeria adopts law imposing death penalty on forest arsonists
-
Man City sponsor Etihad says considering legal action against Premier League
-
France unveils cost-cutting 2027 budget as borrowing costs rise
-
Family of woman killed by US immigration agent sues Trump administration
-
Brazil court orders removal of fake posts amid patron saint election row
-
French school protests spread as fires, blockades deepen unrest
-
Italy's firefighting planes return home after scorching summer
-
UK tribunal overturns ban on Naomi Campbell leading charities
Authors hold London protest against Meta for 'stealing' work to train AI
Around 100 authors on Thursday protested outside the London headquarters of Meta, accusing the US tech giant of "stealing" content to train its Artificial Intelligence models.
Writers chanted "Meta, Meta, book thieves" as they made their way to the Meta building, with some carrying placards reading "I'd write a sign but you'd steal it" and "Get the Zuck off our books", in reference to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg.
A US court filing earlier this year alleged that Zuckerberg approved the company using the online library "LibGen", which provides access to copyrighted works and contains more than 7.5 million books.
The Atlantic magazine has published a searchable database of the titles contained in "LibGen", allowing authors to find out if their works may have been used to train Meta's AI models.
A Meta spokesperson told the Guardian that "we respect third-party intellectual property rights and believe our use of information to train AI models is consistent with existing law."
But AJ West, author of "The Spirit Engineer", said he felt "abused and disgusted" when he found his work on the database.
"To have my work that took years to write, and that I poured my heart and soul into, used to make tech billionaires even more money, without my permission, is so disgusting," he told AFP.
"They've taken my books and fed them into a machine that is specifically designed to ruin me," he added.
West attempted to deliver a letter, signed by leading authors including Kate Mosse and Richard Osman, at the Meta front desk, but found the doors locked.
"It's very telling that a company that saw fit to steal billions of words is now afraid of 500 words on one sheet of paper. It's insult piled upon insult," he said.
West called on the UK government to intervene, saying it was "reprehensible" that Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy had "said nothing" about "the biggest attack on British copyright in history".
- 'Has to be consequences' -
Author and TV writer Gail Renard, 69, told AFP that "if you stole a diamond ring there'd be consequences and there has to be consequences".
"The creative industry is Britain's second-biggest industry. We bring in £125 billion ($164 billion) a year. If you want to kill off the creative industries, kill off our copyright. There's a lot of anger here," added the author.
Artist and author Sophie Parkin, 63, said the situation was "a life-changer for everybody, because what's the point of going on writing?"
"They aren't even creating anything, they are stealing our words and then making money out of it," added Parkin, who was wearing a sign on her sunhat reading "AI pay authors".
She also urged the government to take action, accusing Prime Minister Keir Starmer of "toadying up to these billionaires".
The protest was yet another instance of creators of copyrighted works focusing anger on companies building generative AI platforms that ingest huge amounts of words, images or sounds to build their predictive models.
The leading AI companies have put forward claims that they are allowed to do so under US "fair use" provisions, but that argument is started to be tested in courts in America and elsewhere.
G.Schulte--BTB