-
Kenya reports first-ever Ebola death
-
Le Pen vows drastic cost savings to prevent French 'default'
-
Tennis world No.1 Sinner's season over due to knee injury
-
'Eats through a straw': French teens wounded in high school protests
-
Yemen's Houthis claim attack on Riyadh airport, deny losing territory
-
Thousands mass in France for high school protests
-
7-Eleven exits India amid mounting competition
-
Moscow denies sanitary measures over plague reports
-
The alleged murder by US marine on Okinawa: five things to know
-
Samoa look to recreate 2022 final run at Rugby League World Cup
-
End of an era as Messi prepares to hang up Argentina boots
-
Asian stocks mostly up after tech-led Wall St record
-
Superstar duo headline strong New Zealand squad for Rugby League World Cup
-
German factory orders plunge as recovery still fragile
-
South Korea warns of possible AI use in banking hacks
-
Coco Gauff calls out online racism following China open video review
-
EU vows AI rules will protect Europeans. Will they?
-
KVB Accelerates Middle East Footprint with Strategic MENA Regional Expansion
-
Myanmar leader to visit Malaysia after migrant returns begin
-
Purple reign: Philippines seeks to keep grip on ube throne
-
Germany's AfD poised to preside over state assembly for first time
-
Seoul weighs steps to force North Korea landmine apology
-
Australia's opposition vows 'largest cut to immigration' in country's history
-
Yemen's Houthis say struck Riyadh airport, other Saudi sites
-
Ready, set, snooze: Sleep-deprived Japanese compete for best-rested
-
Changer+ Launches Stablecoin-First Self-Custodial Wallet to Make Stablecoins Easier to Use
-
Falcons thump Saints 45-24 as New Orleans marks Katrina anniversary
-
White Sox down Guardians, Yankees on brink after Rays loss
-
Tuvalu govt adviser says Australia overstepped in pre-COP visit
-
COP31 eyes modest steps as climate disasters multiply
-
Asian stocks mixed despite tech-led Wall St record
-
American Nobel laureate in medicine hopes to illuminate the brain
-
Tens of thousands expected in Paris for high school protests
-
Trump approves firing squad for convicted US military base shooter
-
AI borrowing binge rattles US markets
-
Grappling with 'homework scams,' US universities shun AI detectors
-
Young Canadians sue government over alleged climate failures
-
Separatists win Quebec election in test for Canada PM
-
White Sox down Guardians to take 2-0 series lead
-
Leaders visit Pacific atoll at frontline of climate change
-
NHL record-breaker Ovechkin says current season will be his last
-
Yemen's Houthis claim striking Riyadh airport, other Saudi sites
-
France roar back in Nations League as Italy beat Turkey
-
Best-selling British author Jeffrey Archer dies aged 86
-
Messi readies for final farewell in Argentina send-off
-
Military plane crash kills 32 in Nigeria
-
Esposito seals Italy win over Turkey in Nations League
-
Olise powers France to win over Belgium in Nations League
-
Russia downplays plague reports as Trump offers US help
-
High-flying Blazy turns to birdlife at Chanel
US Supreme Court curtails power of individual judges to block Trump
A divided US Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a major victory on Friday by curbing the power of lone federal judges to block executive actions.
In a 6-3 ruling stemming from Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship, the court said nationwide injunctions issued by district court judges "likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has granted to federal courts."
The top court did not rule on the constitutionality of Trump's executive order seeking to end automatic citizenship for children born on American soil.
But the broader decision on the scope of judicial rulings removes a big roadblock to Trump's often highly controversial policy agenda and has far-reaching ramifications for the ability of the judiciary to rein in Trump or future American presidents.
Trump celebrated by telling reporters he had "a whole list" of policies he could now proceed on without opposition in the courts.
Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship is just one of a number of his moves that have been blocked by judges around the country -- both Democratic and Republican appointees – since he took office in January.
Courts have, for example, blocked or slowed down his hardline immigration crackdown, firing of federal employees, efforts to end diversity programs and punitive actions against law firms and universities.
Past presidents have also complained about national injunctions shackling their agenda, but such orders have sharply risen under Trump, who saw more in his first two months than Democrat Joe Biden did during his first three years in office.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a Trump appointee who authored the majority opinion joined by the other five conservative justices, said "the universal injunction was conspicuously nonexistent for most of our Nation's history."
"Federal courts do not exercise general oversight of the Executive Branch," Barrett wrote.
"When a court concludes that the Executive Branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power, too," she said.
The three liberal justices dissented with Justice Sonia Sotomayor saying "no right is safe in the new legal regime the Court creates."
"The Court's decision is nothing less than an open invitation for the Government to bypass the Constitution," Sotomayor said.
"The Executive Branch can now enforce policies that flout settled law and violate countless individuals' constitutional rights, and the federal courts will be hamstrung to stop its actions fully," she said.
- 'GIANT WIN' -
Trump, in a post on Truth Social, welcomed the ruling as a "GIANT WIN."
The case was ostensibly about Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship, which was deemed unconstitutional by courts in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state.
But it actually focused on whether a single federal district court judge has the right to issue a nationwide block to a presidential decree with a universal injunction.
The issue has become a rallying cry for Trump and his Republican allies, who accuse the judiciary of impeding his agenda against the will of voters.
Steven Schwinn, a law professor at the University of Illinois Chicago, said the court's ruling "sharply undermines the power of federal courts to rein-in lawless actions by the government."
"The ruling will likely create a patchwork of birthright citizenship rights," Schwinn told AFP, where it is recognized in some locations for people who have successfully sued and not recognized for people who have not sued.
"This patchwork approach to individual rights is inconsistent with our history and tradition of federal rights in the United States and is inconsistent with the rule of law," he said.
The Trump administration had asked the Supreme Court to restrict the application of a district court's injunction solely to the parties who brought the case and the district where the judge presides.
Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship decrees that children born to parents in the United States illegally or on temporary visas would not automatically become citizens.
The three lower courts ruled that to be a violation of the 14th Amendment, which states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."
C.Kovalenko--BTB