-
Celtics to trade Jaylen Brown to 76ers for Paul George: report
-
Harry Kane: England's World Cup saviour
-
Streamex is making digital gold accessible
-
US actor Danny Glover says he has Alzheimer's
-
Mixed US auto sales in Q2 amid high gas prices
-
Trump sees progress as US, Iran hold Qatar talks
-
Pistons forward Harris reportedly headed to Spurs
-
Djokovic, Sinner into Wimbledon third round, Andreeva stunned
-
Jovial Djokovic dismantles Tsitsipas to reach Wimbledon third round
-
Spurs agree club record £100 mn move for Newcastle's Tonali - reports
-
US stocks retreat to open Q3 ahead of June jobs data
-
Rain has final say in 1st England-India T20 as Sooryavanshi still awaits debut
-
'Gus' the T. rex presented in New York ahead of auction
-
England refused to accept defeat in 'beautiful' DR Congo win, says Tuchel
-
Kane saves England after DR Congo scare; US eye last 16
-
'Let the dogs in': Sabalenka wants Wimbledon to lift ban
-
Catholic society defies Vatican by consecrating new bishops
-
Oppressive heat broils US during World Cup, July Fourth
-
New York prepares for Taylor Swift-Travis Kelce wedding
-
Can anyone stop France at the World Cup?
-
Pair climb to top of Empire State Building for apparent proposal
-
Sinner, Sabalenka into Wimbledon third round, Andreeva stunned
-
French Open champ Andreeva stunned by Krejcikova at Wimbledon
-
England have 'hero moments', says Kane after double downs DR Congo
-
Kane rescues England after DR Congo scare; US eye last 16
-
努莎·奧貝爾:為市民實施時速10公里限速,波茨坦的「坑洞政策」——是漠不關心還是無能為力?
-
Kane rescues England from DR Congo calamity to reach World Cup last 16
-
US refuses to extend North America trade pact in current form
-
'Iran, Iran!' Iranian World Cup squad serenaded on return home
-
Mixed US auto sales in 2nd quarter amid high gas prices
-
Pereira 'taken by complete surprise' as Forest let boss go
-
Swiatek, Zverev hoping to lay down Wimbledon markers
-
Нуша Аубель: «Скорость 10» для жителей: политика Потсдама в отношении выбоин — безразличие или некомпетентность?
-
Spray-painted letters spell tragedy for Venezuela quake victims
-
Rufus the hawk patrolling Wimbledon tennis club
-
'Everybody's profiting': Trump defends $1bn crypto earnings
-
Record heat broils US east coast amid World Cup, July Fourth events
-
WTA Finals moved from Riyadh to Indian Wells
-
Bayern sign Morocco midfielder Saibari on five-year deal
-
Messi returns 'home' to lead Argentina World Cup charge in Miami
-
Hope fades, hunger sets in a week after Venezuela quakes
-
England skipper Sciver-Brunt 'threw everything' at World Cup semi-final return
-
Noosha Aubel: 10 km/h for residents – Potsdam’s approach to potholes: indifference or incompetence?
-
Stocks mixed with eyes on US Fed
-
Bayern to host Stuttgart in Bundesliga season opener
-
Trial begins for suspected mastermind of Malta journalist killing
-
US Fed chair says committed to combatting 'too high' prices
-
Traditionalist Catholic society defies Vatican by consecrating new bishops
-
Portugal braces for high temperatures in new heatwave
-
World number ones Sinner, Sabalenka into Wimbledon third round
Kirk killing sparks fierce US free speech debate
For Americans, the words are practically sacred: the First Amendment to the US Constitution guarantees freedom of speech.
But that right is now the subject of bitter debate, following the assassination of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk.
On Thursday, several high-ranking Democrats accused President Donald Trump of waging war on free speech, after he celebrated ABC's suspension of talk show host Jimmy Kimmel, who accused the political right of using Kirk's death to score points.
The American Civil Liberties Union, a rights advocacy group, accused the Trump administration of operating outside constitutional safeguards to target its opponents, likening it to the Red Scare of the late 1940 and 1950s under senator Joseph McCarthy.
"This is beyond McCarthyism. Trump officials are repeatedly abusing their power to stop ideas they don't like, deciding who can speak, write, and even joke," said Christopher Anders, director of the ACLU's democracy and technology division.
So what does the First Amendment say? And why is it up for debate?
- 'How we identify ourselves' -
Ratified in 1791, the Bill of Rights comprises the first 10 amendments to the US Constitution, protecting the fundamental rights of Americans.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble," the First Amendment says.
For David Super, a professor at Georgetown University's law school, the amendment is "really how we identify ourselves as a nation."
Beyond the varied ethnicities and background of the nation's 340 million people, "we are thought to be drawn together by a belief in open discussion and a belief that the government can't shut any of us up," Super told AFP.
The First Amendment even protects speech that is "morally repulsive," explained Eugene Volokh, a professor of law at the University of California, Los Angeles.
Volokh however emphasized that the history of the United States has been marked by attempts to stifle dissident voices.
- 'Malicious writings' -
In 1798, America's second president John Adams signed into law the Sedition Act, which forbade "any false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States."
Then during World War I, the expression of pacifist ideology was banned.
From the 1920s to the 1950s, anyone expressing support for communist ideals risked serious repercussions. And in the 1960s, officials in several southern US states battled to silence the civil rights movement.
One of the key pillars of Trump's political movement has been to eviscerate "cancel culture" -- the process of criticizing someone for voicing an opinion seen as unacceptable, to the point of that person being ostracized or fired.
Trump has often called "cancel culture" a scourge of leftist progressives, claiming that it has been used to silence conservative pundits and politicians.
But Democrats have turned the tables on Trump, accusing him of doing the same to US media organizations, major universities and, now, Kimmel -- a frequent target of Trump's ire.
"After years of complaining about cancel culture, the current administration has taken it to a new and dangerous level," Democratic former president Barack Obama wrote Thursday on X.
- Conservative push-back -
US Attorney General Pam Bondi sparked controversy among conservatives by saying earlier this week that the Justice Department would pursue anyone guilty of "hate speech" linked to the slain influencer.
Republican Senator Ted Cruz quickly countered that the Constitution "absolutely protects hate speech." Bondi then said she meant to refer to "threats of violence that individuals incite against others."
Conservative commentator Tucker Carlson called for "civil disobedience" should Kirk's murder result in an uptick in laws limiting free speech.
And some voices on the far right have criticized a decree signed by Trump in August that makes burning the American flag punishable by up to a year in prison.
The US Supreme Court ruled in 1989 that burning the Stars and Stripes indeed amounted to free speech, and was protected by the First Amendment.
"I would never in a million years harm the American flag," conservative radio host Jesse Kelly wrote on X.
"But a president telling me I can't has me as close as I’ll ever be to lighting one on fire. I am a free American citizen. And if I ever feel like torching one, I will."
F.Müller--BTB