-
Sarah Taylor named England men's fielding coach
-
No plans for PGA outside USA or moving off May date
-
US Senate backs Trump on Iran war despite deadline lapse
-
Key urges 'world-class' bowler Robinson to make England recall count
-
From Black Death to Covid, ships have long hosted outbreaks
-
Furyk wants long-term US Ryder blueprint, maybe role for Tiger
-
McIlroy back on course on eve of PGA despite blister
-
Eulalio seizes control of drenched Giro d'Italia
-
New trial ordered for US lawyer convicted of murdering wife, son
-
Stocks rise ahead of US-China summit
-
US wholesale prices jump 6.0% year-on-year in April, highest since 2022
-
Nations drawing down oil stocks at record pace: IEA
-
Carrick on brink of permanent Man Utd job: reports
-
Strong US economy's resilience to shocks tested by Iran war
-
Italy cheers UK's Catherine on first foreign visit since cancer diagnosis
-
Keys says players will strike over Grand Slam pay if 'necessary'
-
Eurovision stage inspired by Viennese opera
-
Gunshots at Philippine Senate as lawmaker wanted by ICC holds out
-
Winning worth the wait for Young no matter the ball
-
The Chilean town living with the world's most polluting dump
-
Donald pleased to have Rahm back for Ryder three-peat bid
-
Stocks waver, oil steady ahead of US-China summit as Iran talks stall
-
War in Middle East: latest developments
-
No cadmium please: French want less toxin in their baguettes
-
Warsh set to take over a divided Fed facing Trump assaults
-
Shots heard at Philippine Senate as lawmaker wanted by ICC holds out
-
France locks down 1,700 on cruise ship after 90-year-old dies
-
After the hobbits, director Peter Jackson tackles 'Tintin'
-
Real Madrid win legal battle over Bernabeu concert noise
-
EU won't ban LGBTQ 'conversion therapy' but will push states to act
-
Revived Swiatek cruises past Pegula and into Italian Open semis
-
Shots heard at Philippine Senate as lawmaker wanted by ICC holds out: AFP
-
Vin Diesel drives 'Fast and Furious' tribute in Cannes
-
Heckler ejected from Eurovision after Israel song disruption
-
Australia's North savours 'tremendous honour' of England role
-
For hantavirus, experts aim to inform without igniting Covid panic
-
Japan rides box office boom into Cannes
-
Trump arrives in China for superpower summit with Xi
-
UK's Catherine on first official foreign trip since cancer diagnosis
-
British scientists among winners of top Spanish award
-
Mbappe can show 'commitment' to Real Madrid: Arbeloa
-
Chinese tech giant Alibaba posts profit drop amid AI drive
-
King Charles lays out Starmer's agenda as PM fights for survival
-
Japan suspend Eddie Jones for verbally abusing officials
-
England drop Crawley for 1st Test against New Zealand
-
Stocks rise ahead of US-China summit as Iran talks stall
-
One trip, one ticket: New EU rules aim to ease train travel
-
SoftBank profit quadruples to $32 bn on AI investments
-
Africa must drop 'victim mentality': mogul Tony Elumelu
-
'Ungovernable' Britain? Once-stable politics in freefall
Legal whiplash over abortion pill undermines care, say providers
The return of US abortion policy to the Supreme Court has triggered confusion around the use of the abortion pill mifepristone, legal whiplash that providers and major medical bodies say undermines care.
In recent weeks, US courts have restricted the drug -- and then paused the restriction -- triggering uncertainty as to whether patients can receive the pill by mail following a virtual medical appointment.
Mifepristone is key to a common protocol for abortion as well as miscarriage management, and its restriction could have devastating effects nationwide, medical professionals say.
"It's dizzying," New Jersey abortion provider Kristyn Brandi told AFP.
"How do we navigate a system where we kind of know what's best for our patients, but can't give it to them, because we don't know what the rule is today."
In a major win for anti-abortion advocates, a federal appeals court on May 1 rolled back mail access via telehealth to the medicine, which has been allowed nationally since 2021.
Quickly thereafter, two drugmakers filed an emergency motion asking the Supreme Court for a stay to allow time for an appeal, which was granted for one week.
The justices are now considering whether to further extend the stay while litigation proceeds -- meaning telemedicine access to mifepristone would remain legal, for now -- or allow it to expire. That decision is expected by Monday.
- 'Monumental tragic consequences' -
In the meantime, the legal seesawing has sown uncertainty over the pill that the US Food and Drug Administration approved more than a quarter-century ago.
More than one in four people who have an abortion obtain medication via telehealth, according to the Guttmacher Institute, which tracks reproductive health data.
Many major medical societies say mail access makes reproductive health care safer and more equitable, especially for people of limited means or who live in rural areas far from clinics.
Medical providers in US states where abortion rights are protected also were able to prescribe and mail the medication to patients who might not otherwise have access.
The appeals court ruling sided with officials in Louisiana, who had argued that mailed mifepristone prescribed via telehealth was undermining state abortion laws, which count among the country's most restrictive.
If that decision is allowed to come into effect, delivering mifepristone by post would be prohibited everywhere across the country -- in states with strict limits, but also where abortion rights are protected.
The move, according to lawyer Julie Dahlstrom, would have "quite simply, monumental tragic consequences."
- Alternative protocol -
Mifepristone blocks the hormone progesterone. It is used to end pregnancies through 10 weeks gestation in combination with the drug misoprostol, which stimulates contractions and softens the cervix, allowing tissue to expel.
If the ruling on mifepristone is upheld, in-person dispensing requirements would be reinstated nationwide. Providers also are preparing to prescribe a single-drug protocol via telehealth using misoprostol only.
That method is also long-proven, safe, and effective, Brandi said.
But broadly speaking, the combination regimen is preferred, as it can help hasten the process and curb uncomfortable side effects including cramping and bleeding.
"Should this really take effect, it will be yet another step backward in the care of pregnant people," Helen Weems, an abortion provider in rural Montana, told journalists.
The two-drug protocol is also used to manage miscarriage, but Brandi fears the legal wrangling over mifepristone is creating "stigma."
The back-and-forth fosters confusion but also distrust, she said: "It further perpetuates the myth of like, the sketchy abortion doctor in the back alley."
- 'We shouldn't be here' -
Brandi, the obstetrician-gynecologist in New Jersey, also warned that political theater prevents future advances.
Drugs often have more than one application, and Brandi said continuous research is needed not just for abortion and miscarriage care, but to better treat a gamut of health issues such as uterine fibroids.
Jen Castle, the national director of abortion service delivery at Planned Parenthood, vowed that "no matter what the Supreme Court does, we are still working to get people the care they need."
She noted the wealth of peer-reviewed research supporting mifepristone's safety and efficacy as well as decades of real-world use.
"Let's just remember," Castle said, "the bottom line is that we shouldn't be here at all."
C.Kovalenko--BTB