- French police kill man trying to set fire to synagogue
- Hong Kong, Shanghai stocks rally on China property support
- Barca coach Xavi set for sack - reports
- 'Couldn't agree terms': Tuchel confirms exit despite Bayern U-turn
- 'As long as it takes': Georgia's Gen Z leading street protests
- At Thailand dive expo, fears for coral's future
- Saudi crown prince seeks soft power in game hub Japan
- 'We had a great time': Klopp prepares for Anfield farewell
- 'Couldn't agree on terms': Tuchel confirms Bayern exit
- Paul McCartney becomes UK's first billionaire musician
- Energy transition risks critical mineral shortage: IEA
- 'Fight of the century': Fury, Usyk in rare undisputed clash
- Hurricanes survive fightback to regain Super Rugby top spot
- 'Balaclavas and big sticks': New Caledonia tourists trapped by riots
- Thiago, Matip to leave Liverpool at end of season
- Israel says S.Africa 'genocide' case at UN court 'totally divorced' from facts
- Gaza fighting rages after Israel vows to intensify Rafah offensive
- Hong Kong, Shanghai stand out in Asia on China property support
- IEA warns of key energy mineral shortage risk
- Israel says S.Africa 'genocide' case 'totally divorced' from facts
- Defender Matip to leave Liverpool at end of season
- Musk confirms Twitter has become X.com
- Gomes eyes becoming first Portuguese coach to win CAF Cup
- Crisis-ridden Boeing prepares for turbulence at annual meeting
- Hong Kong, Shanghai stand out in Asia after China property move
- Coppola faces press after epic 'Megalopolis' splits Cannes
- China offers to buy up commercial housing to boost property market
- US military says first aid delivered to Gaza via temporary pier
- Muslim professionals quit 'hostile' France in silent brain drain
- China cuts rates, could buy up commercial housing to boost property market
- Costner, Gere, Demi Moore: Hollywood icons on Cannes comeback trail
- Brazil to host 2027 Women's World Cup as Gaza overshadows FIFA meeting
- Palestinians call for Israeli ban as Gaza war spills into football
- Crisis-ridden Boeing hopes for quiet annual meeting
- Vienna Festival director Milo Rau hits back at anti-Semitism accusations
- China says could buy up commercial housing to boost property market
- Rapidus 'last opportunity' to put Japan back on global chip map
- Despite Western pressure, China in no hurry to reduce Russia support
- For sale: unique piece of land in strategic Arctic archipelago
- La Rochelle in the spotlight as tight Top 14 run-in commences
- Three key issues to watch for in La Liga this weekend
- Departing Hayes urges Chelsea to seize 'second chance' in WSL race
- Leverkusen eye 'immortality' as Union fight for final day survival
- Klopp leaves lasting legacy after restoring Liverpool to elite
- Putin in trade push on final day of China trip
- Timberwolves crush Nuggets to stay alive in NBA playoffs
- Taiwan president takes office under close scrutiny
- Israel to hit back at 'genocide' claims at UN top court
- Chinese officials meet to mull support for developers: Bloomberg
- 'Hindu nation': Religion trumps caste in India vote
US judge grills both sides in landmark Google antitrust trial
A US judge on Thursday pushed against the central pleas of both US government and Google lawyers as he heard their closing arguments at a landmark antitrust trial in Washington.
Federal Judge Amit Mehta, whose decision is not expected until later in the year, raised his questions during two days of hearings that come six months after the conclusion of testimony.
The case is the first of five major lawsuits by the US government to reach trial, with Meta, Amazon, Apple and a separate case against Google also heading for federal court.
The trial is the first time the US Department of Justice (DOJ) has faced a big tech company in court since Microsoft was targeted more than two decades ago over the dominance of its Windows operating system.
The decision in the search engine case will be made by Judge Mehta, who presided over several months of testimony that saw Google CEO Sundar Pichai and other top executives take the stand.
At the heart of the government's case is the massive payments made by Google to Apple and other companies to keep its world-leading search engine as the default on iPhones, web browsers and other products.
The trial revealed payments reaching tens of billions of dollars every year for Google to keep its prime real estate on Apple hardware or the Safari and Mozilla browsers.
In 2022, Google paid Apple $20 billion for the default status, trial documents unsealed this week showed.
DOJ lawyers allege that Google achieved and perpetuated its dominance -- and strangled rivals -- through these default deals that also expanded to Samsung and other device makers.
But Judge Mehta expressed doubts that the case had sufficiently demonstrated the negative consequences necessary to deem the deals anti-competitive according to US law and precedent.
The key precedent is the landmark Microsoft case, which helped define how a tech platform can illegally abuse its monopoly to punish rivals.
But Mehta inferred that the Google case was very different from Microsoft's as it did not involve agreements to outright exclude competing browsers and other products.
"This case is different" because the user of an iPhone has the option to download and use rival apps, Mehta said.
"You have to show actual anti-competitive effects. You have to establish foreclosure first and if you can't, you lose," Mehta told the US government lawyers.
- Billions to Apple -
Mehta also poked holes in Google's defense, wondering how any rival search engine with a similar quality product could win access to the default deals if the cost would require tens of billions of dollars.
"Even if they can meet on that (quality) battlefield, they then would have to spend billions more to make Apple whole," Mehta said.
Mehta also focused questions on whether search queries on Amazon, Facebook or Expedia competed with Google, as argued by the tech giant.
Including activity on those websites would damage the US case, which rests on maintaining that general search, in which Google has over 80 percent of the US market share, is the relevant market.
Mehta also homed in on Google's contention that DuckDuckGo, the privacy focused search engine, was a competitor.
"You really think that DuckDuckGo is a competitor on Google?" Mehta asked Google's lawyer, who insisted that it was.
Lawyers from the Justice Department also faced pointed questions, with Mehta rejecting the idea that Google's dominance has stifled innovation for search.
That would be "a hard road for you to go down", the judge warned.
B.Shevchenko--BTB