-
Trump's ex-lawyer all set for confirmation as US attorney general
-
Japan defender Tomiyasu joins Crystal Palace
-
WHO urges Ervebo vaccine trial in DR Congo Ebola outbreak
-
Celtic boss O'Neill out of hospital after 'small procedure'
-
Hardline Trump ally De la Espriella to take office in Colombia
-
Man City reject Barcelona bid for Rodri - reports
-
Cambridge to review hiring process amid plagiarism row
-
US unexpectedly loses jobs in blow to Trump ahead of midterms
-
STARTRADER in Discussions with Trustpilot to Consolidate Review Profiles
-
Dollar drops, stocks climb after surprise US jobs miss
-
US unexpectedly loses jobs in blow to Trump's economy claims
-
Thai students in disbelief after deadly school shooting
-
Call for Infantino to resign comes in wake of wave of support
-
McLaren boss glad of 'harmony' between F1 teammates Norris and Piastri
-
Gaza beekeeper starts again on rooftop amid ruins of war
-
Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan sign defence pact amid regional war
-
MEXC Lists New Ondo Tokenized Stock Pairs Spanning AI Infrastructure, Semiconductor and Rare Earth Sectors
-
Maradona bloated, bedridden and resigned before death, says icon's masseur
-
Fleming 'like me, but better': McCullum on new England Test coach
-
Infantino and the failed investment plan -- What they said
-
European stocks rise before US jobs report
-
Thailand teen kills seven in home, school shooting
-
Meta ordered to pay $567 mn in US over 'public nuisance' child harm
-
Volt Funded Launches Globally with Evaluation Program Offering Up to 90% Profit Share
-
Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan to sign defence pact amid regional violence
-
Indonesia battles Mount Bromo wildfire as El Nino takes root
-
PU Prime Expands Gold Trading with the Launch of XAUUSD247
-
STARCARES Revamps Basketball Court at the University of Lagos for Future Healthcare Professionals
-
Oil extends gains and stocks mostly down on fresh Hormuz worries
-
Eight dead, including teen suspect's grandparents, in Thailand shooting
-
Four dead, 15 injured in Thailand school shooting: deputy minister
-
Indonesia traps monkey to end rampage that wounded 18 people
-
Military shake-up poses little threat to Ukraine's drone revolution
-
Food security fears mount as UK farmers battle drought
-
Camels find unlikely home in outback Australia
-
Houthi missile attacks kill 58 Saudi-backed Yemeni govt forces
-
Pacific nations fail to agree on statement condemning China missile test
-
Chinese activist held in Bangkok finds Canada refuge
-
Anguish and hope: why a Tibetan set himself on fire in New York
-
Kiss takes reins as Wallabies face Japan
-
Oil extends gains and stocks fall on fresh Hormuz worries
-
North Korea touts dog soup and other home-cooked recipes to beat the heat
-
Venezuela's political transition talks wrap first day in Caracas
-
UK observatory nervously watches growing space junk threat
-
South Africa coach Erasmus wary of struggling Argentina
-
Meta ordered to pay US state $567 mn to abate 'public nuisance' and child harm
-
Actress, engineer, jihadist's widow among Syria's new women MPs
-
Houthi missile attacks kill 58 Saudi-backed Yemeni govt forces: source
-
Battling Norrie survives match point to oust de Minaur
-
No.1 Sabalenka and Pegula advance at Toronto
UN court opinion due on occupied Palestinian land
The UN's top court will on Friday hand down its view on the legal consequences of Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories since 1967, amid growing international pressure over the war in Gaza.
Any opinion delivered by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) would be non-binding, but it comes amid mounting concern over Israel's war against Hamas sparked by the group's brutal October 7 attacks.
A separate high-profile case brought before the court by South Africa alleges that Israel has committed genocidal acts during its Gaza offensive.
Judges will read their findings at 1300 GMT at the opulent Peace Palace in The Hague, the home of the ICJ.
The UN's General Assembly asked the ICJ in late 2022 to give an "advisory opinion" on the "legal consequences arising from the policies and practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem".
The ICJ held a week-long session in February to hear submissions from countries following the request -- supported by most countries within the Assembly.
Most speakers too during the hearings called on Israel to end its 57-year occupation. They warned a prolonged occupation posed an "extreme danger" to stability in the Middle East and beyond.
But the United States said Israel should not be legally obliged to withdraw without taking its "very real security needs" into account.
Israel did not take part in the oral hearings.
Instead, it submitted a written contribution in which it described the questions the court had been asked as "prejudicial" and "tendentious".
- 'Ongoing violation' -
The General Assembly has asked the ICJ to consider two questions.
Firstly, the court should examine the legal consequences of what the UN called "the ongoing violation by Israel of the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination".
This relates to the "prolonged occupation, settlement and annexation of the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967" and "measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem".
In June 1967, Israel crushed some of its Arab neighbours in a six-day war, seizing the West Bank including east Jerusalem from Jordan, the Golan Heights from Syria, and the Gaza Strip and Sinai Peninsula from Egypt.
Israel then began to settle the 70,000 square kilometres (27,000 square miles) of seized Arab territory.
The UN later declared the occupation of Palestinian territory illegal, and Cairo regained Sinai under its 1979 peace deal with Israel.
The ICJ has also been asked to look into the consequences of what it described as Israel's "adoption of related discriminatory legislation and measures".
Secondly, the ICJ should advise on how Israel's actions "affect the legal status of the occupation" and what are the consequences for the UN and other countries.
The ICJ rules in disputes between states. Normally, its judgements are binding although it has little means to enforce them.
In this case however, the opinion it issues will be non-binding, although most advisory opinions are in fact acted upon.
O.Lorenz--BTB