-
Heir to £50m Estate Convicted of Grievous Bodily Harm in Pub Assault
-
Best Pet Advent Calendars for Christmas 2026: Dog Treats and Cat Toys
-
Vodacom Targets Late 2027 Launch for Satellite-to-Phone Service in South Africa
-
FUBAR PAC Founder Jack Inacker Targets Sen. Fetterman After Midterm Success
-
Rutgers Defeats NJIT 101-64 Behind Francis and Mark Scores
-
Far-Right Extremists Claim Opportunity to Seize Control of GOP After Midterms
Natural disasters caused $135 bn in economic losses in first half of 2025: Swiss Re
Natural disasters caused $135 billion in economic losses globally in the first half of 2025, fuelled by the Los Angeles wildfires, Swiss Re said Wednesday.
Swiss Re, which serves as an insurer of insurance companies, said first half losses were up from the $123 billion in the first half of 2024.
The Zurich-based reinsurance giant estimated that of this year's first half losses, $80 billion had been insured.
The Los Angeles blazes in January constitute the largest-ever insured wildfire loss event by far, reaching an estimated $40 billion, said Swiss Re.
It said the "exceptional loss severity" of the fires was down to prolonged winds, a lack of rainfall and "some of the densest concentration of high-value single-family residential property in the US".
The March earthquake in Myanmar figured among the major natural disasters in the first six months of the year, with the tremors felt in neighbouring Thailand, India, and China.
In Thailand alone, insured losses reached $1.5 billion.
The second half of the year is usually more costly for insurers due to damage during the North Atlantic hurricane season.
"The strongest lever to increase the resilience and safety of communities is to double down on mitigation and adaptation. It's here that everyone can help reduce losses before they occur," said Swiss Re's group chief economist Jerome Haegeli.
"While mitigation and adaptation measures come at a price, our research shows that, for example, flood protection measures such as dykes, dams and flood gates are up to 10 times more cost-effective than rebuilding."
P.Anderson--BTB