-
Back to black: facing energy shock, Asia turns to coal
-
Iran fires new wave of missiles at Israel after denying Trump talks
-
Manila's jeepney drivers struggle as Mideast war sends diesel cost soaring
-
The contenders vying to be next Danish leader
-
India's historic haveli homes caught between revival and ruin
-
Denmark votes in close election, outgoing PM tipped to win
-
N. Korea's Kim vows 'irreversible' nuclear status, warns Seoul of 'merciless' response
-
Pressure on Italy as play-off hopefuls eye 2026 World Cup
-
Malinin and Sakamoto seek solace at figure skating worlds as Olympic champions absent
-
'Perfect Japan' posts spark Gen Z social media backlash
-
Asian stocks rise on Trump U-turn but unease sees oil bounce
-
Pistons halt Lakers streak while Spurs, Thunder win
-
Silence not an option, says Canadian Sikh activist after fresh threats
-
Rennie shakes up All Blacks backroom team as 2027 World Cup looms
-
Australia, EU agree to sweeping new trade pact after eight years
-
Too old? The 92-year-old US judge handling Maduro case
-
Australia, EU agree sweeping new trade pact
-
Sinner, Sabalenka march on in Miami as more seeds crash out
-
US social media addiction trial jury struggles for consensus
-
EU 'concerned' by reports Hungary leaked information to Russia
-
EU chief meets Australian PM as trade talks enter 'last mile'
-
Israel pounds south Beirut, says captured Hezbollah members
-
EU chief to meet Australian PM as trade talks enter 'last mile'
-
Champion Mensik, Medvedev dumped out of Miami Open
-
Jury at US social media addiction trial reports 'difficulty' in finding consensus
-
Stokes eager to lead England recovery after 'hardest period of captaincy'
-
Venezuela protesters demand end to 'hunger' level wages
-
Eight people arrested in Brazil for 'brutal' attack on capybara
-
Audi Q9 – how likely is it to become a reality?
-
Oil slides, stocks rebound on Trump's Iran remarks
-
On Iran, Trump executes his most spectacular U-turn yet
-
Trump announces 'very good' Iran talks denied by Tehran
-
Bill Cosby ordered to pay $19m over sex abuse claim
-
Dodgers eye 'threepeat' as new MLB season welcomes robot umpires
-
Dacia Striker: Stylish and sturdy?
-
Skoda Peaq: New all-electric seven-seater
-
Medvedev ousted by Cerundolo at Miami Open
-
Runway collision kills two pilots at New York airport
-
Bosnian truckers blocked EU freight terminals for a day over visa rules
-
Colombia military aircraft crashes with 125 aboard, many feared dead
-
Rip-offs at the petrol pump?
-
Shakira to wrap up world tour with Madrid residency
-
World gave Israel 'licence to torture Palestinians': UN expert
-
Colombia says 80 troops on crashed aircraft, many feared dead
-
France turns to 2027 race to succeed Macron
-
New Mercedes GLC electric
-
Namibia rejects Starlink licence request
-
Ex-model questioned in France over scout with Epstein links
-
UK sending air defence systems to Gulf: PM
-
Trump administration seeks to ease oil fears but industry wary
Israel concedes soldier likely shot Al Jazeera journalist
The Israeli army conceded for the first time Monday that it was likely Palestinian-American reporter Shireen Abu Akleh was shot dead by an Israeli soldier who mistook her for a militant.
"There is a high possibility that Ms Abu Akleh was accidentally hit by IDF (Israel Defense Forces) gunfire that was fired toward suspects identified as armed Palestinian gunmen," said the army's final investigation report into her May 11 death.
The acknowledgement comes after months in which the army had insisted it was impossible to determine the source of the deadly shot that killed the celebrated Al Jazeera journalist in the occupied West Bank, saying it could have been militant fire.
"Our conclusion is that it's not possible to determine unequivocally which gunfire killed her, but there's a higher probability that she was hit by an errant shot of an IDF soldier who did not identify her as a journalist," a senior Israeli military officer said.
Abu Akleh was wearing a bulletproof vest marked "Press" and a helmet when she was shot in the head during the Israeli army operation on May 11.
The Abu Akleh family on Monday said that Israel had "refused to take responsibility for the murder" of the journalist, in a press release issued in the wake of the Israeli army's investigation report.
"We remain deeply hurt, frustrated and disappointed," the family said, calling for a "credible" US investigation.
The Palestinian Authority accused Israel of intentionally killing the reporter in the Jenin refugee camp, in the northern West Bank, whereas Israel has insisted that even if a soldier fired the fatal shot it was not deliberate.
- 'Call for accountability' -
On Monday, the senior army officer told reporters that the Israeli soldiers were under heavy fire and aimed to hit Abu Akleh because they had mistaken her for a Palestinian militant.
"When they fired in her direction they didn't know she was a journalist, it was a mistake, they thought they were firing at terrorists shooting at them," the officer said.
"He's sorry about it and I'm sorry about it too," the officer said of the soldier who shot in the direction of Abu Akleh.
"He didn't do it on purpose, it's totally clear," he added.
A United Nations investigation concluded in June that there was "no evidence of activity by armed Palestinians close by" when Abu Akleh was shot.
The United States on July 4 said she was likely shot by Israeli fire but that there was no evidence her killing was intentional and that the bullet was too damaged for a conclusive finding.
The US statement outraged Abu Akleh's family and Palestinian leaders who accused Washington of failing to seek accountability from Israel over the killing of the journalist, who also held US citizenship.
"We are continuing to call for accountability and for justice for Shireen," Lina Abu Akleh, the journalist's niece, said in Washington after meeting US Secretary of State Antony Blinken.
In May, Israel's military advocate had said there was no suspicion of criminal activity since the event took place in an active combat zone.
The military advocate said Monday that the circumstances of the incident "do not raise the suspicion of a crime having been committed which would justify the opening of a criminal investigation".
K.Thomson--BTB