-
ARKBRIDGE Outlines Jonathan Morelli’s “Picks and Shovels” AI Infrastructure Investment Strategy
-
Versus Trade Wins Best ECN/STP Broker APAC 2026, Marking Third UF Awards Recognition
-
Tech sell-off rolls on as hot inflation data stokes rate worries
-
Three dead as Istanbul sees heaviest rainfall in 80 years
-
McIlroy makes 'solid' start in rain-hit Delhi as Norgaard leads
-
US producer prices see biggest jump since 2022 in added challenge to Trump
-
Seven missing after fire on vessel in Black Sea off Romania
-
Swiatek avoids seed exodus to breeze into Wuhan last eight
-
'Severe drought' declared in parts of UK
-
PM condemns 'chaos' as violent protests grip Albania
-
IUX Announces New Web Client Portal Built for Enhanced Browser-Based Trading
-
'I couldn't breathe', Russell Brand's alleged rape victim says
-
School roof collapse kills teacher, 32 children in NW Pakistan
-
Pope's cancer operation already reshaping papacy
-
Inter skipper Martinez facing month out with thigh injury
-
Zverev cruises past De Minaur to reach Shanghai semi-finals
-
Spanish prosecutors back abuse probe into Julio Iglesias
-
Ukraine's Zelensky defies Trump with Russian refinery strikes
-
Tech sell-off deepens as US inflation sparks AI jitters
-
Holders Australia edge New Zealand 24-22 to open Rugby league World Cup
-
Southgate does not forsee a return to management
-
'Ocarina of Time': Nintendo gives Zelda classic a modern makeover
-
Two dead as Istanbul endures heaviest rainfall in 80 years
-
France charges teen shooter citing revenge for bullying in school
-
After latest Nepal flood, survivors fear for future
-
Martinez blames 'anger' for dig at Man Utd hierarchy
-
EU leaders clash over budget as spectre of French elections looms
-
Crowds build as Albanian PM tours protest aftermath
-
'No place to breathe': life in Indonesia's fire epicentre
-
China-North Korea bridge opens, 12 years late
-
'Can't sleep': Spain's housing crunch upends lives
-
Asian Cup in Saudi Arabia could be postponed but 'no hurry' to decide: AFC
-
Musk calls on Ukraine's Zelensky to 'go' after satellite slowdown row
-
Conrad wields axe after South Africa loss to Australia
-
Still smiling at 117, Albanian may be world's oldest woman
-
School roof collapse kills teacher, 27 children in NW Pakistan
-
Pope has 'good night' in hospital: Vatican
-
Haze turns Indonesia skies orange, shuts schools in East Timor
-
China's economy seen missing target as global shocks bite: AFP poll
-
California puts first US billionaire tax to the vote
-
Costa Rica opens jail inspired by El Salvador mega-prison
-
School headscarf ban meets resistance in Austria
-
Same-sex couple takes fight for equality to Slovakian court
-
World's top cocoa producer aims for a climate-tough bean
-
'High hopes' as Indonesian women get a football league, again
-
Why is Shell facing lawsuits over climate disasters in Brazil and the Philippines?
-
'Expectations high' for Bordeaux-Begles' Champions Cup hat-trick bid, says Depoortere
-
New four-lane bridge opens between China, North Korea
-
Rennie urges All Blacks to stay focused against 'hurting' Wallabies
-
Tech stocks lead rout after US inflation fuels rate hike bets
South Korea court recognises rights of same-sex couples
South Korea's Supreme Court recognised new rights for same-sex couples Thursday, saying the state must provide health insurance for a gay man's partner in a landmark ruling that left activists weeping for joy.
"National Health Insurance should recognise spousal insurance coverage for same-sex couples," the court ruled, with activists breaking into cheers as the verdict was read out.
The verdict, which cannot be appealed as it comes from the country's highest court, means common-law spouses of the same sex can now register as dependents on their partners' health insurance.
"It is discrimination based on sexual orientation to exclude the couple just because they are same-sex," the court ruled.
"It is a discriminatory act that violates human dignity and values, the right to pursue happiness, freedom of privacy, and the right to be equal before the law, and the degree of infringement is serious."
The case was brought by a gay couple, So Seong-wook and Kim Yong-min, who live together and held a wedding ceremony in 2019.
It had no legal validity, however, as South Korea does not recognise same-sex marriage.
In 2021, So sued the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) because it terminated benefits for his partner -- whom he had registered as a dependent -- after discovering they were a gay couple.
In a landmark ruling last year, a Seoul High Court found in favour of the couple, mandating that the NHIS reinstate the dependent benefits.
The service, which grants spousal coverage benefits to common-law partners, appealed the decision, escalating the case to the Supreme Court.
- 'Historic victory' -
The Supreme Court ruling is a pivotal moment for the country's LGBTQI community, and people holding rainbow umbrellas walked out of the court, wiping away tears of joy.
While the country does not recognise same-sex marriages, gay relationships are not criminalised. LGBTQ people tend to live largely under the radar.
Activists have long emphasised the need for legislation against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
A much-discussed anti-discrimination law has languished in the South Korean parliament for years, due to a lack of consensus among MPs.
Outside the court ahead of the verdict, anti-LGBTQI Christian organisations staged a protest, holding up banners saying "let us repent to the Lord".
When the couple So Seong-wook and Kim Yong-min attempted to hold a press conference after the verdict, Christian activists disrupted it by speaking in tongues and shouting: "homosexuality is a sin!"
Amnesty International said the ruling was "a historic victory for equality and human rights in South Korea".
"The Court has taken a significant step towards dismantling systemic discrimination and ensuring inclusivity for all," the rights group said in a statement.
"While this decision is a major milestone, the case itself is a sobering reminder of the lengthy judicial processes that same-sex couples must endure to secure basic rights that should be universally guaranteed.
"It is disheartening that in 2024, same-sex couples still face such significant barriers to equality."
D.Schneider--BTB