-
Prince Harry, Meghan to carry out first joint engagement since UK return: reports
-
Pope to be operated on for lump on lung
-
Last Ceuta migrant camp removed ahead of Spanish king's visit
-
India's 'cockroach' leaders vow to keep up election protests
-
Ukraine to stop refinery strikes when Russia curbs energy attacks: Zelensky
-
Pope says to be operated in 'coming days' for lung nodule
-
Pakistan imposes emergency rule in Imran Khan's provincial stronghold
-
Ukraine irrelevant to Russia and IOC's relationship: Russian minister
-
Manchester City brace for hostile Liverpool reception after guilty verdict
-
Brennan keeps his cool in Japan for third PGA Tour victory
-
Brazil's Lula accuses Meta of election interference
-
Bezzecchi wins in Indonesia as Martin retakes MotoGP championship lead
-
South Korea completes trial of Arctic shipping route
-
US Open finalist Shelton dumped out in Shanghai third round
-
アレックス・ボディ、CRIFとともに透明性の高い投資と徹底した資金洗浄防止に注力
-
India releases 'cockroach' leaders as movement calls for more protests
-
Brennan holds off Schauffele for PGA Tour win in Japan
-
Ο ALEX BODI δίνει έμφαση, σε συνεργασία με την CRIF, στις διαφανείς επενδύσεις και στη συστηματική πρόληψη της νομιμοποίησης εσόδων από παράνομες δραστηριότητες
-
ALEX BODI satsar tillsammans med CRIF på transparenta investeringar och ett konsekvent arbete mot penningtvätt
-
ALEX BODI sází ve spolupráci s CRIF na transparentní investice a důslednou prevenci praní špinavých peněz
-
ALEX BODI stawia wraz z CRIF na przejrzyste inwestycje i konsekwentne przeciwdziałanie praniu pieniędzy
-
एलेक्स बोदी क्रिफ के सहयोग से पारदर्शी निवेश और धनशोधन की कड़ाई से रोकथाम पर ज़ोर देते हैं
-
알렉스 보디, CRIF와 함께 투명한 투자와 철저한 자금세탁방지에 주력
-
ALEX BODI 攜手 CRIF,推動透明投資並貫徹洗錢防制
-
ALEX BODI turns to CRIF for transparent investment and rigorous money laundering prevention
-
Indian court releases 'cockroach' movement leaders from detention
-
The 'cockroach' protests against India's election body
-
Indonesia releases eight orangutans rescued from fires to protected forest
-
Power, water, jobs: Google on India data centre concerns
-
Russian Yandex data centre operations disrupted after drone strike
-
Google faces backlash against India data centre
-
Architect fights to save India's past, built on 'stone, tears and sweat'
-
Trump urges Zelensky replacement as diesel row rages
-
Hurricane Simon strengthens as it nears western Mexico
-
New Yorkers snap up discarded subway signs, seats at annual sale
-
'Everyone is angry': Okinawans fearful and frustrated after killing
-
Messi nets brace to win in first match after Argentina exit
-
Trump's trade wars sting US manufacturers ahead of midterms
-
Ravindra fit for New Zealand ODI series against India
-
Kenyan great Kipchoge wins first marathon in three years
-
All Blacks lose four players for second Wallabies Test
-
Barca extend perfect streak, Real Madrid survive Vinicius red
-
Spanish women return to action with 2-0 friendly win over USA
-
PSG ease to Ligue 1 win before Manchester City test
-
Bordeaux-Begles end wait for away win before Champions Cup defence
-
Real Madrid edge Villarreal, Vinicius sent off for hair pull
-
Traumatized Panamanians begin quake recovery
-
Carrick demands more 'streetwise' Man Utd after Spurs setback
-
Palestinian Mahmoud Abu Hamda wins top photography prize at Bayeux
-
10-man Tottenham ramp up pressure on Man Utd boss Carrick
The UK car loan scandal that could cost banks billions
Banks may have to pay out tens of billions of pounds if the British Supreme Court upholds a judgment ruling controversial car loans are unlawful, in a case beginning in April.
These loans incentivised car dealers to offer higher interest rates in return for a higher commission, without sufficiently informing borrowers.
Consumer association Which! estimated that millions of drivers would become eligible for compensation if the UK's highest judicial authority sides with borrowers.
The government, however, sought to intervene in the case amid concerns over the economic fallout.
"Such a substantial sum could limit banks' ability and willingness to lend and provide credit at a time when the economic outlook remains uncertain," said AJ Bell investment director Russ Mould.
"This may be why the government is seeking to intervene," he added.
Marcus Johnson is one of the claimants whose case is under consideration by the Supreme Court.
He took out a loan in 2017 when he bought a Suzuki Swift from a car dealer in Cardiff, Wales for £6,500 ($8,400) -- unaware that interest paid on the loan would fund a commission of over £1,600.
The Court of Appeal in October ruled in favour of Johnson, ordering South African lender FirstRand Bank to refund the commission plus interest -- sparking panic across the finance sector.
Now, the Supreme Court will hear his case on April 1, along with another similar case against FirstRand and one against British bank Close Brothers.
If the court sides with borrowers after the three-day hearing, it will set a precedent for similar cases across the country, potentially triggering billions in compensation.
"In each of these three linked appeals, the claimants were financially unsophisticated consumers on relatively low incomes," the Supreme Court said in its case summary.
It has rejected the government's attempt to intervene.
- £44 billion -
In preparation for the ruling, British banks have set aside considerable sums, including Lloyds Bank, which has earmarked nearly £1.2 billion.
Which! estimated it could cost banks up to £16 billion, while other analysts expect the sums to be higher, with those at HSBC suggesting it could hit £44 billion.
That "would put it on a similar scale to the payment protection insurance (PPI) scandal, where the major UK high street lenders reportedly paid out some £45 billion to £50 billion between them," said Mould.
The Financial Conduct Authority banned undisclosed commissions in 2021 and launched a separate investigation into the practice early last year.
The financial watchdog plans to wait for the Supreme Court ruling before deciding whether to start a programme for automatic compensation.
"Even if the Supreme Court upholds the Court of Appeal judgement, it could act to limit and reduce any compensation payments, and that could well represent the best-case scenario for the lenders," Mould added.
O.Lorenz--BTB