-
US leads fresh Ukraine peace push with Miami talks
-
Brazil election offers Jair Bolsonaro a shot at revenge
-
Verstappen continues resurgence with pole for Singapore sprint
-
Man Utd boss Carrick 'personally' affected by Man City verdict
-
Cuban ration book, symbol of the revolution, gathers dust
-
Evolution Metals & Technologies Corp. Raises Fiscal 2026 Revenue Guidance 62% at Midpoint to $10–$11 Million and Reaffirms $400–$460 Million Fiscal 2027 Outlook
-
Stocks advance, oil retreats as Trump rules out pre-vote Iran attack
-
Red Bull's Verstappen takes pole position for Singapore GP sprint race
-
Man City case causing 'uncertainty' for whole Premier League, says Iraola
-
Chelsea star Palmer 'committed' to England insists Alonso
-
Talks with Iran can only succeed without threats, president says
-
OpenAI denies firing researchers over AI safety warnings
-
Home hope Zheng sets up Mertens clash in China Open semis
-
Turkey warns opposition, press over investment fund crisis
-
Lombardia promises gripping end to season in Pogacar absence
-
Hurricane Isaias now major storm as it heads to US Gulf Coast
-
Barca skipper Raphinha out against Getafe and Galatasaray
-
Djokovic crashes out of Shanghai Masters in his first match
-
MEXC and Payward Highlight Collaboration as Crypto and TradFi Converge at TOKEN2049
-
EU says Turkey's crackdown on rights hampers membership bid
-
EU states agree beefed-up European financial markets watchdog
-
Two Renoir paintings stolen in France recovered: mayor
-
Eritrea, Ethiopia trade barbs as Tigray rebels retreat
-
German leader outraged at Schroeder birthday visit to Putin
-
Kompany 'proud' of Man City success despite guilty verdict
-
Stocks up, oil retreats as Trump rules out pre-vote Iran attack
-
Man City will win appeal over financial charges, says Maresca
-
South African judge Navi Pillay wins Nobel Peace Prize
-
Fernandez logs record lap at Indonesia MotoGP practice
-
'I completely trust the club,' says Man City boss Maresca
-
Navi Pillay: S.Africa's global rights activist and Nobel winner
-
'10 out of 10' Quintana reminisces over dream Vuelta win
-
Ufunded Launches “Spotlight” Series, Documenting the Minds Shaping Modern Trading
-
Maddinson given shock recall but fails to score
-
Russell goes fastest in practice for smoggy Singapore GP
-
Navi Pillay, South African rights champion, wins Nobel Peace Prize
-
For exiled Russian director Zvyagintsev, triumph without belonging
-
Saudi Arabia says three killed at airport as Yemen war expands
-
Home hope Zheng storms into China Open semi-finals
-
Everton's US owners mull sale of club two years after takeover
-
Zverev churns out win in Shanghai Masters opener
-
Ukraine takes Russia fight to 'scorching sands' of Sahel
-
Hurricane Isaias strengthens en route to US Gulf Coast
-
Chinese AI tool pulled to prevent 'misuse' after South Korea hacks
-
US activists deploy poll volunteers over Trump intimidation fears
-
Asian stocks mostly up as traders weigh AI, oil dips after surge
-
Saint Laurent designer Vaccarello leaves after glittering decade
-
Walking through flames: orangutans rescued in Indonesia fires
-
'Tough to stay here': Nepal flood survivors wait for homes
-
LeBron shines in pre-season debut for re-tooled 76ers
Lidl owes French rival $50 mn after ads ruled deceptive
German supermarket chain Lidl faces a 43-million-euro ($50 million) payout to a French rival after an appeals court ruled its ads to be deceptive.
The Paris appeals court ordered Lidl to pay the amount to French chain Intermarche after finding hundreds of the television spots that it ran between 2017 and 2023 were likely to deceive consumers and amounted to unfair competition.
While Intermarche lost the original trial in 2022, the appeals court considered in its July 4 ruling that Lidl's ads were deceptive as the hard discount retailer had not ensured the items it promoted were available in all of its shops at the advertised price for a period of 15 weeks.
The appeals court judge found that in the more than 370 ads contested by Intermarche that Lidl had prominently featured the products and prices but had used small print or brief off-screen voice mentions to see its website for participating stores.
The court ruled those mentions were "likely to go unnoticed by the consumer or at the very least be misunderstood."
Moreover, it considered that by knowing it didn't have the products available at all sites for a sufficient time that Lidl's actions went from being deceptive practices to unfair competition, thus opening the way for compensation to its rival.
Intermarche declined to comment when contacted by AFP.
E.Schubert--BTB