-
Alex Bodi pushes ahead with expansion: ALIX LASERS showroom planned for Bucharest
-
Quarantine, unease and rumours: Russian city grapples with plague scare
-
Fossil fuels off COP31 agenda as global output keeps rising
-
Taiwan says exports hit record in September on AI demand
-
Haze not 'a threat' to Singapore F1 race: organisers
-
Marc Marquez vows to 'attack' Martin's lead at Indonesian MotoGP
-
COP31 organisers say to seek 'ambitious' action with their text
-
Diplomats, schools in Saudi take safety measures after blasts heard: sources to AFP
-
Bartunkova thrashes Muchova to reach China Open semi-finals
-
In Beijing, EU trade envoy says deficit with China 'unsustainable'
-
Drone hits Yandex data centre, in first such attack on Russia
-
Sri Lanka's de Silva quits as Test captain
-
Oil prices surge and stocks sink on fresh inflation worries
-
Alcaraz feeling 'mentally fresh' ahead of Shanghai return
-
AI startup Manus raises $500m after Meta acquisition blocked by China
-
Israel drastically reduces British diplomatic presence in Jerusalem
-
From refuge to repatriations: Malaysia's Myanmar U-turn
-
Stocks fall further as oil surge fans fresh inflation worries
-
Morikawa says LIV players face 'business decision' after Rahm exit
-
North Korea demands South show 'utmost respect' to restore relations
-
Tenzing Norgay's son says Himalayas sending climate warning
-
Saudi says three dead in airport attacks claimed by Houthis
-
On your bike! Bottas opts for two wheels to reach Singapore GP
-
'Mad dream': New showcase for African film opens in London
-
Alcaraz, Sinner, Osaka commit to Australian Open '1 Point Slam'
-
All Blacks coach Rennie says Wallabies exit 'part of the game'
-
Dodgers beat Braves to advance in MLB playoffs, Rays oust Yankees
-
The growing protests against India's poll body - and PM Modi
-
'A sun as black as my lungs': how corruption crucified a polluted Albania city
-
Stocks fall further as oil spike fans fresh inflation worries
-
The British historian helping the French rediscover de Gaulle
-
Bad COP, worse COP? EU tempers hopes for UN climate summit
-
Dodgers beat Braves to advance, Guardians survive in MLB playoffs
-
Rookie Henry named in Wallabies midfield to face All Blacks
-
Latin American, Caribbean women top Nobel literature buzz
-
Housing crisis set to dominate Spain's snap election
-
US says Fiji-based Chinese official paid bribes for Beijing
-
Gas, health care, utilities: high costs squeeze US midterm voters
-
After botched US execution, Christa Pike was nearly taken off life support
-
New Zealand Rugby seeks injunction over PNG Chiefs name
-
Guinea-Bissau junta urges military unit loyal to ex-president to disarm
-
Samsung expects 780% quarterly operating profit jump on AI boom
-
As species decline, green turtles offer glimmer of hope
-
Guardians survive with 9-3 win over White Sox
-
Brothers Scott and Beauden Barrett named to start for All Blacks
-
Saudi Arabia says 3 dead at airports after Houthis claim attacks
-
EU trade chief seeks to dial down China tensions
-
Stocks slide as oil sees volatile trading day over Iran war fears
-
'Never again Bolsonaro': thousands march ahead of Brazil election runoff
-
Microsoft pushes AI vision with new, expensive Surface laptop
Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU
Does protecting children justify snooping on private messages? That is the sensitive question facing EU countries Wednesday as they wrangle over a push to combat child sexual abuse material online.
The meeting in Brussels could seal the fate of a legislative initiative that has stirred fierce debate since it was put forward by the European Commission in May 2022.
Backed by multiple child protection groups, the proposal would require online platforms and messaging services to detect and report images and videos of abuse, as well as attempts by predators to contact minors.
But critics -- including the EU's own data protection authorities, lawmakers, and countries such as Germany -- warn it poses a "disproportionate" threat to privacy.
They are particularly alarmed by the use of technology that would scan private conversations, including on encrypted apps like Signal and WhatsApp.
"This would spell the end of secrecy of correspondence, which is essential for whistleblowers," the German activist and former EU lawmaker Patrick Breyer told AFP.
His big fear? That such legislation could eventually be exploited by authoritarian regimes to "crack down on political opponents" by monitoring their conversations.
Messaging platforms themselves staunchly oppose the plans.
- Mass surveillance? -
Opponents have been flooding EU officials with messages aimed at swaying the debate as part of a campaign dubbed "Stop Chat Control" -- their nickname for the proposal.
"I've never seen anything like it, on any other file," one EU diplomat told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We're receiving thousands of emails every day."
Denmark, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency and drafted the latest version of the proposal, insists it includes the necessary safeguards.
Firstly, only images and links -- not text messages -- would be subject to scanning.
Second, the system would only be activated following a decision by an independent judicial or administrative authority.
"We have to be very clear: under this proposal, there is no general monitoring of online communications. There will be no such thing as 'chat control'," said European Commission spokesperson Markus Lammert.
"This is about protecting our children against a terrible crime, a crime that happens more and more online."
- Germany holds key -
A report by the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation found that 62 percent of the child sexual abuse material identified internationally last year was hosted on servers within the EU.
Under the bloc's current rules, platforms detect such content on a voluntary basis, which Brussels considers inadequate given the scale and rapid growth of the problem.
The existing legal framework remains in place until April 2026 -- pending adoption of the commission's new proposal making detection mandatory.
What happens next will hinge largely on Germany, with two possible scenarios following Wednesday's meeting:
-- If Berlin backs the proposal, that would likely push it past the post under the EU's qualified majority voting rules. Member states could then formally adopt the measure at a meeting in Luxembourg next week.
-- If Berlin abstains or remains opposed, that would send negotiators back to the drawing board, with no certainty the text will eventually become law.
Several EU officials involved in the talks said Germany could make its stance known in the coming hours.
J.Fankhauser--BTB