-
Powell probe leaves US Fed leadership change in limbo
-
Celine Dion announces comeback following health struggle
-
'Is it Kafka?' US judge baffled by new Pentagon press policy
-
Cubans ready for Russian oil but some say not enough
-
Teen Suryavanshi shines as Rajasthan hammer Chennai in IPL
-
Stock market winners and losers one month into US-Israel war on Iran
-
Hodgson says surprise return to management is only for short-term
-
What could Trump achieve by threatening Iran's Kharg Island?
-
India declares victory over Maoist insurgency
-
Germany's Merz pushes return of Syrians as he hosts leader Sharaa
-
G7 ministers pledge 'necessary measures' to ensure stable energy market
-
Cardiff City lose compensation case over Emiliano Sala death
-
Several French far-right mayors take down EU flags
-
Air Canada CEO to retire after row over English-only condolence message
-
Oil rises on Trump's Iran threats, stocks take cue on talks
-
Syrian leader pledges to work with Germany on migration, recovery
-
AI agent future is coming, OpenClaw creator tells AFP
-
Cardiff lose 122 mn euro compensation case over Emiliano Sala death
-
Tuchel defends Rice and Saka after England withdrawals
-
G7 ministers tackle economic fallout of Mideast war
-
Tottenham close in on De Zerbi as next boss - reports
-
Kenya's former NY marathon champion Korir gets 5-year doping ban
-
Lukaku says 'could never turn back on Napoli' after treatment row
-
Syrian leader visits Germany to talk war, recovery, refugees
-
Renault says developing ground-based military drone
-
Iran hangs two 'political prisoners' from banned opposition: activists
-
Russia expels UK diplomat on spying allegations
-
Premier League fans back call to scrap VAR
-
Italy hoping to scale World Cup 'Everest' ahead of Bosnia play-off showdown
-
Japan's cherry blossom season dazzles locals and tourists
-
EU ups mackerel quotas to match UK despite overfishing concerns
-
Crude rises, stocks drop as Houthi attacks escalate Iran war
-
Australian Rules player banned for wiping blood on face of opponent
-
Sheep culls put pressure on Greek feta cheese production
-
One man, his dog, and ChatGPT: Australia's AI vaccine saga
-
Israel PM restores access after Latin Patriarch blocked from Holy Sepulchre
-
Israel strikes Tehran as Trump says Iran deal may be reached 'soon'
-
Italy chase World Cup spot as Kosovo bid to make debut
-
Myanmar paves way for junta chief to become civilian president
-
'Long live the shah': Iranian diaspora back war at Washington rally
-
Taiwan opposition leader accepts Xi's invitation to visit China
-
French masonic lodge at heart of murky murder trial
-
US military building 'massive complex' beneath White House ballroom project: Trump
-
IPL captain takes pop at Cricket Australia over record-buy Green
-
G7 ministers set to tackle financial fallout of Mideast war
-
Premier League fans feel the pinch from ticket price hikes
-
Australia to halve fuel tax in response to Middle East war
-
Crude surges, stocks dive as Houthi attacks escalate Iran war
-
Air China resumes flights to North Korea after 6-year pause
-
NBA-best Thunder beat Knicks as Boston seal playoff spot
WHO regrets Trump move to pull US from organization
The World Health Organization said Tuesday it "regrets" US President Donald Trump's decision -- just hours after taking power -- to withdraw his country from the UN agency, saying it hoped he would reconsider.
Trump on Monday signed an executive order directing the United States to withdraw from the WHO, a body he has repeatedly criticized over its handling of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Speaking at the White House after his inauguration, Trump said the United States was paying far more to the United Nations body than China, adding: "World Health ripped us off."
Washington, comfortably the biggest financial contributor to the Geneva-based organization, provides substantial support that is critical to the WHO's operations.
The UN health agency expressed disappointment Tuesday over Trump's decision.
"WHO plays a crucial role in protecting the health and security of the world's people, including Americans," spokesman Tarik Jasarevic told a press briefing in Geneva.
"We hope the United States will reconsider and we look forward to engaging in constructive dialogue to maintain the partnership between the USA and WHO, for the benefit of the health and well-being of millions of people around the globe."
The American withdrawal could leave global health initiatives short of funding.
This marks the second time Trump has sought to sever ties with the WHO.
During his 2017-2021 first term, the United States issued a notice of intent to withdraw, accusing the organization of being overly influenced by China during the pandemic's early stages.
That move was later reversed under Joe Biden's administration.
Jasarevic stressed it would take one year from formal notification being deposited with the UN for the United States to leave the WHO.
- China promises support -
The European Commission voiced "concerns" at Trump's decision, warning it could undermine the response to future pandemics.
"If we want to be resilient to global health threats, we need to have global cooperation," commission spokeswoman Eva Hrncirova told reporters. "We trust that the US administration will consider all this ahead of the formal withdrawal."
In China, a foreign ministry spokesman said Beijing would continue supporting the UN agency.
"The role of the WHO should only be strengthened, not weakened," Guo Jiakun said.
"China will, as always, support the WHO in fulfilling its responsibilities... and work towards building a shared community of health for humanity."
In his new executive order, Trump directed agencies to "pause the future transfer of any United States Government funds, support, or resources to the WHO" and to "identify credible and transparent United States and international partners to assume necessary activities previously undertaken by the WHO."
The administration also announced plans to review and rescind Biden's 2024 US Global Health Security Strategy -- designed to prevent, detect, and respond to infectious disease threats -- "as soon as practicable."
Several experts expressed dismay at the withdrawal.
"We cannot make WHO more effective by walking away from it," Tom Frieden, a former senior health official under Barack Obama, wrote on X.
"The decision to withdraw weakens America's influence, increases the risk of a deadly pandemic, and makes all of us less safe."
Others warned that by exiting the organization, the United States will lose privileged access to important epidemic surveillance data which could harm the capacity to monitor and prevent health threats from abroad.
"Instead of being the first to receive vaccines, we will be at the back of the line," Lawrence Gostin, professor of public health law at Georgetown University, wrote on X.
"Withdrawal from WHO inflicts a deep wound on US security & our competitive edge in innovation."
The timing comes amid mounting fears over the pandemic potential of the current bird flu outbreak (H5N1), which has infected dozens and claimed one life in the United States.
Meanwhile, WHO member states have been negotiating the world's first treaty on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response since late 2021 -- negotiations now set to proceed without further US participation.
M.Furrer--BTB