-
Tiny Elversberg stun Leverkusen on Bundesliga debut, Dortmund beat Hamburg
-
Newcastle condemn dismal Spurs to second successive defeat
-
Police appeal for footage after life-threatening Stratford assault
-
Baladi Map app turns Lebanon’s local problems into a public record
-
Family searches for Boston engineer missing after Nepal-Tibet floods
-
Thirty-seven Mumbai pilgrims return after Nepal flood disruption
-
Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library leaves global children’s reading legacy
-
Ankle ligament tear ends Neeraj Chopra’s 2026 season
-
BMC rejects negligence claims in three Rajawadi Hospital maternity cases
-
Chinchpoklicha Chintamani begins 2026 arrival procession in Parel
-
Chembur man held over alleged poisoning of woman’s soft drink
-
Cyberabad civic body demolishes 19 unauthorised structures
-
Andhra Pradesh Speaker seeks stronger sports quota and school facilities
-
About 50 Karnataka travellers return from Nepal as 24 remain missing
-
Kolkata police register new FIR against Mamata Banerjee over rally timing
-
French campaign sharpens as far right accuses left over civil disobedience calls
-
India and China have not named two new border meeting sites
-
Court orders JIPMER assessment of Durai Dayanidhi before money-laundering trial
-
Tamil Nadu and NUS agree to expand postgraduate and research links
-
Chennai councillors unite across parties to demand ward development funds
-
Tamil Nadu goalball team’s national silver highlights need for wider support
-
Tambaram civic groups seek action on eight long-pending issues
-
Rural Tamil Nadu students present 64 technology projects at IIT-M research park
-
Three Texas Tech softball players hurt in jet ski collision
-
Matt Leinart assesses Arch Manning and the leading names in college football
-
Felony assaults on older New Yorkers rise sharply, police data show
-
Los Angeles triplets weigh 19.3 pounds in unusually heavy birth
-
New finds strengthen case for Bethsaida at Sea of Galilee site
-
Editorial questions Letitia James’ record as New York attorney general
-
Five college football games that could shape the 2026 season
-
James Cleverly leaves shadow cabinet to seek London mayoralty
-
In London, son's agonising wait for news of parents missing in Nepal-Tibet floods
-
Norway's King Haakon VIII pays tribute to late father in first speech
-
Ivory Coast captain Kessie snubs Juventus to rejoin Atalanta
-
South Africa survive onslaught to beat New Zealand and level series
-
Strasbourg fight back to beat Lens in Ligue 1
-
Apple Raises TV Streaming Price to $14.99 a Month
-
Milo Yiannopoulos Deported to Britain After ICE Arrest in Louisiana
-
Ketogenic Diet Delivers Largest Liver-Fat Reduction in Three-Diet Trial
-
Mets Reinstate Juan Soto Without Minor-League Rehab Assignment
-
Ohio State Leads 2026 Preseason College Football Top 25
-
Study Examines Why Women Have Consensual Sex Without Initial Desire
-
Milo Yiannopoulos Arrives in UK Following U.S. Deportation
-
Bryan Kohberger Seeks Judge’s Removal From Post-Conviction Case
-
Chennai Sets ₹100 Crore Flood-Readiness Plan for Vulnerable Areas
-
BJP Rejects Caste Allegation Over Haldwani Venue Ritual
-
Nepal Flood Death Toll Reaches 675 as Rescuers Confront Rain and Tunnel Crisis
-
Maharashtra Accepts Tribal Students’ Demands After 17-Day Protest
-
Sixteen Keralites Return From Flood-Hit Nepal as Seven Remain Uncontactable
-
Tamil Nadu Plans District Safe Houses for Couples Facing Caste Violence
UK set for ruling on plan to deport migrants to Rwanda
UK high court judges were on Monday due to rule on challenges to the British government's controversial policy of deporting migrants and asylum-seekers to Rwanda.
Irregular migration is a thorny political issue for the UK government which promised to tighten borders after the country left the European Union.
It is currently grappling with how to deal with a record over 40,000 migrants who have crossed the Channel from its European neighbours in small boats this year alone.
In a bid to deal with the unprecedented number of arrivals, former prime minister Boris Johnson's Conservative government in April announced a scheme to deport migrants thousands of miles away to Rwanda, provoking a storm of outrage.
According to the arrangement, the British government had hoped to send anyone entering the UK illegally, as well as those who have arrived illegally since January 1, to Rwanda.
But deportation flights were stymied by a series of legal challenges in the UK courts and at the European Court of Human Rights.
A first flight of a small group of asylum-seekers had been due to take off from the UK in June but it was halted following a last-minute injunction by the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.
In the UK, one court challenge was brought by individual asylum-seekers, the PCS union whose members would have to implement the removals, and migrant support groups Care4Calais and Detention Action.
Before the first full hearing of that challenge in September, PCS General Secretary Mark Serwotka said sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was "not only immoral and unlawful -- our members tell us it's unworkable too".
- 'Global migration crisis' -
Lawyers for the parties argued that the policy was unlawful on multiple grounds including the assessment of Rwanda as a safe third country.
A second challenge was brought by the charity Asylum Aid.
Johnson defended the policy as vital to resolving the problem of "illegal cross-Channel trafficking of people whose lives are being put at risk by the gangs".
Four people died last week after a small boat packed with migrants capsized in the Channel in freezing weather conditions.
After Johnson was ousted, both his successors as party leader and prime minister -- first Liz Truss and then Rishi Sunak -- pledged to continue the policy.
Sunak's Home Secretary Suella Braverman has said it is her "dream" to finally see a plane carrying migrants take off for Kigali.
In an interview published on Saturday, Braverman suggested that the European Convention on Human Rights and the UN refugee convention, both of which have thrown up obstacles to the Rwanda policy, were outdated when dealing with modern-day migration.
"There are legitimate questions about whether that international framework is fit for purpose when we're seeing a global migration crisis," she told The Times daily.
Such conventions and international agreements had been struck in the aftermath of World War II and "designed for a world where travel was not cheap, numbers were much lower, flows of people were much smaller", she said, adding that the government was pursuing similar agreements to the Rwanda one with other countries.
Justice Lewis and Justice Swift are due to give judgments in both challenges before the court on Monday.
I.Meyer--BTB