-
How to Watch the Rugby League World Cup Final on 7plus for Free
-
Women's Asian Champions Trophy 2026 in Bhopal Revives Hockey Legacy
-
Kayla Harrison Defeats Amanda Nunes via Submission at UFC 334
-
California GOP Faces Near-Extinction After 2026 Midterms; Calls for New Vision
-
GTA 6 Advertising Strategy and Disc Version Controversy
-
St Francis School Leads €60,000 EU Project to Transform Early Childhood Education
-
From First Date to Wedding Day: How a TV Quote Sparked a Lifetime Commitment
-
South Africa's Universal Health Coverage Depends on Tackling Poverty and Inequality
-
Malta Stuns Sweden with Late Penalty Comeback in Rugby Europe Trophy
-
Rare Siberian Rubythroat Dies in UK Garden After Cat Attack
-
BingX: Major Announcement of Far-Reaching Significance
-
Go Kyung-pyo Drunk Driving Incident Prompts Heavy Editing Across Multiple TV Shows
-
Élan Opens as Late-Night Wine Bar in Honolulu
-
KFF Health News Reporters Discuss ACA Enrollment Challenges, Rising Costs, and Measles Risks
WHO chief urges pandemic accord action after US withdrawal
The head of the World Health Organization insisted on Monday it was "now or never" to strike a landmark global accord on tackling future pandemics, after the United States withdrew from negotiations.
WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said no country could protect itself from the next pandemic on its own -- three days after US President Donald Trump's administration told the UN health agency it was leaving the pandemic agreement talks.
"We are at a crucial point as you move to finalise the pandemic agreement in time for the World Health Assembly" in May, Tedros told WHO members at the opening of the week-long 13th round of negotiations in Geneva.
"It really is a case of now or never. But I am confident that you will choose 'now' because you know what is at stake.
"You remember the hard-won lessons of Covid-19, which left an estimated 20 million of our brothers and sisters dead, and which continues to kill."
A further one-week session is planned before the WHO's annual assembly.
The process began in December 2021, when, fearing a repeat of Covid-19 -- which killed millions of people, crippled health systems and crashed economies -- countries decided to draft an accord on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.
- Next pandemic 'when, not if' -
After returning to office on January 20, Trump signed an executive order to start the one-year process of withdrawing from the WHO, an organisation he has repeatedly criticised over its handling of Covid-19.
The order added that Washington would "cease negotiations" on the pandemic agreement.
Tedros said Washington had formally notified the WHO on Friday of its withdrawal from the talks.
"The next pandemic is a matter of when, not if. There are reminders all around us -- Ebola, Marburg, measles, mpox, influenza and the threat of the next disease X," he said.
"No country can protect itself by itself. Bilateral agreements will only get you so far," Tedros added.
"Like the decision to withdraw from WHO, we regret this decision and we hope the US will reconsider," he said.
- System 'under siege' -
Non-governmental organisations following the pandemic agreement process urged remaining member states to get the accord finished.
Pandemic Action Network said: "Despite geopolitical and policy challenges, do not walk away from this vital mission."
Spark Street Advisors, a health sector consultancy, said the world had changed since the last negotiations in December, with the global multilateral system "under siege".
"This is why member states cannot afford to fail this week. In this new reality meant to reverse decades of progress, the pandemic agreement is a concrete action against this great dismantling," it said.
While much of the draft text has been agreed, disputes remain over sharing access to pathogens with pandemic potential and the sharing of benefits derived from them -- vaccines, tests and treatments.
Talks co-chair Precious Matsoso expressed hoped that proposed new wording would ensure a breakthrough. "Let's make sure that the three years that we've spent does not end up being regretted -- that we wasted three years of our time," she said.
J.Fankhauser--BTB