-
Serena set for much-anticipated Wimbledon return
-
US races to reopen Venezuela port for aid after twin quakes
-
Ex-NBA stars Malik Beasley, Ed Davis indicted in betting case
-
Paris funeral homes overwhelmed after record heatwave
-
EU, China bet on talks to avoid trade war
-
France wary of Sweden side with 'nothing to lose' at World Cup
-
Pyjamas and bets: Brazil YouTube channel reshapes World Cup viewing
-
Bloodied but unbowed: Sinner avoids shock exit at start of Wimbledon title defence
-
Queueing, strawberries and all white: it must be Wimbledon
-
Top US court upholds $5mn Trump sex assault judgment
-
Stokes backs Brook '100 percent' to succeed him as England Test captain
-
Sinner survives scare to reach Wimbledon second round
-
Ebola outbreak in DR Congo spreads to fourth province
-
Six killed in German 'family tragedy' shooting: police
-
Czech Republic coach Koubek quits after World Cup flop
-
Osaka makes spectacular Wimbledon arrival in kimono-inspired dress
-
French parliament adopts bill to regulate fast fashion
-
Bolivia removes 15-year dollar peg in bid to revive economy
-
Supreme Court boosts Trump's power to fire officials, but protects Fed
-
Russia jails veteran who threatened Putin with mutiny
-
Three things we learned from the Austrian F1 Grand Prix
-
Five shot dead at German youth welfare site, two suspects arrested
-
Burnham pledges radical devolution of UK govt if PM
-
New Zealand thrash England to deny Stokes a fairytale finish
-
Polish businesses press Warsaw, Kyiv to end political rift
-
Tour de France 'ready to adapt' amid extreme heatwave
-
Hovland beats Scheffler in playoff for PGA Travelers title
-
Stocks rise, oil climbs after US-Iran clashes
-
New Zealand thrash England for series win as Stokes bows out
-
Man City hire Maresca to start new era after Guardiola
-
Trump says Iran meeting to take place in Qatar
-
Pegula slams Vondrousova's 'harsh' doping ban
-
Spain raises 2026 growth forecast despite Mideast war turmoil
-
Chavez-era housing complex in ruins after Venezuela quakes
-
Kenya-US rare earths deal challenged in court over secrecy
-
Sinner, Djokovic set to start Wimbledon title charge
-
Santner strikes as New Zealand eye England series win
-
Pakistan launches deadliest attack on Afghanistan in months
-
Broos may change decision to quit as South Africa coach
-
Strauss 'dumbfounded' by timing of Stokes's England exit
-
French swim star Marchand suffers injury scare before Europeans
-
Monza turn to Juric for return to Serie A
-
France skipper Dupont to miss Nations Championship
-
Stocks mixed, oil edges up after US-Iran clashes
-
Springbok milestones loom for Willemse and Kolbe against England
-
Catholic traditionalists risk schism in Church
-
Tennis players end Wimbledon prize-money protest
-
Europe's deadly heatwave scorches eastern flank, takes aim at Ukraine
-
Pogacar rides with Del Toro and Yates in quest for fifth Tour de France
-
PSG in talks with Leipzig to buy Ivory Coast star Diomande
Trump's order on nuclear testing: what we know
President Donald Trump has ignited a firestorm of controversy and confusion with his announcement that the United States will begin nuclear weapons testing.
It's unclear whether he was referring to testing weapons systems -- which the United States already does -- or actually conducting nuclear explosions, which only US arch-foe North Korea has carried out in the 21st century.
Below, AFP examines what Trump has said, the state of current US testing, and what it would take to resume explosive tests.
- What Trump said -
Trump said in a social media post that he had instructed the Defense Department "to start testing our Nuclear Weapons on an equal basis" with Russia and China.
However, neither of those countries are confirmed to have carried out recent explosive testing, and it is the Department of Energy that is responsible for the US nuclear stockpile.
The president subsequently told journalists on Air Force One that "they seem to all be doing nuclear testing," and that "we halted it many years ago but with others doing testing I think it is appropriate we do also."
He offered no details on the nature of the testing he had ordered.
- Current US testing -
The United States conducted the world's first nuclear test in July 1945 and used two nuclear weapons against Japan near the end of WWII.
It has carried out more than 1,000 explosive nuclear tests in total -- most recently in 1992 with a 20-kiloton underground detonation at the Nevada Nuclear Security Site.
That year, Congress passed a temporary moratorium on underground nuclear tests unless a foreign state conducted one, which has since occurred. Washington had already agreed not to conduct tests in the atmosphere, outer space and underwater as part of the Limited Test Ban Treaty, which it has been a party to since 1963.
The United States has also been a signatory since 1996 to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, which bans all atomic test explosions, but the Senate has yet to ratify it.
In the absence of explosive testing, the United States ensures its arsenal's reliability through the so-called Stockpile Stewardship Program, which includes "a wide range of scientific activities, from modeling and simulation to subcritical nuclear experiments," according to the US National Nuclear Security Administration.
"This program allows us to assess and certify the stockpile with extraordinary confidence," it says.
Washington also periodically tests its nuclear delivery systems such as intercontinental ballistic missiles.
The US military launched an unarmed Minuteman III missile earlier this year, with the Space Force saying at the time that the United States had carried out more than 300 similar tests overall.
- Resuming explosive testing -
The president has the authority to authorize explosive tests, and Washington's forces have "the capability to resume testing within 24-36 months of a presidential decision to do so," the US Congressional Research Service says.
It notes that a 2012 study found that "the response time for resuming underground explosive testing is driven more by compliance with environmental, health, and safety regulations than by the technical testing requirements or the need to restore equipment and facilities."
Doreen Horschig, a fellow with the Project on Nuclear Issues at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the US National Nuclear Security Administration would be able to "get the test site ready within six to 10 months for a very basic underground test."
"The timeframe is much longer if you want to test new warheads and new capabilities," Horschig said.
But she also noted that there is likely to be political opposition to a resumption of testing "from both sides of the political camps" in the United States, while "our allies (also) do not see a need for (a) return to testing."
D.Schneider--BTB