-
US leads fresh Ukraine peace push with Miami talks
-
Brazil election offers Jair Bolsonaro a shot at revenge
-
Verstappen continues resurgence with pole for Singapore sprint
-
Man Utd boss Carrick 'personally' affected by Man City verdict
-
Cuban ration book, symbol of the revolution, gathers dust
-
Evolution Metals & Technologies Corp. Raises Fiscal 2026 Revenue Guidance 62% at Midpoint to $10–$11 Million and Reaffirms $400–$460 Million Fiscal 2027 Outlook
-
Stocks advance, oil retreats as Trump rules out pre-vote Iran attack
-
Red Bull's Verstappen takes pole position for Singapore GP sprint race
-
Man City case causing 'uncertainty' for whole Premier League, says Iraola
-
Chelsea star Palmer 'committed' to England insists Alonso
-
Talks with Iran can only succeed without threats, president says
-
OpenAI denies firing researchers over AI safety warnings
-
Home hope Zheng sets up Mertens clash in China Open semis
-
Turkey warns opposition, press over investment fund crisis
-
Lombardia promises gripping end to season in Pogacar absence
-
Hurricane Isaias now major storm as it heads to US Gulf Coast
-
Barca skipper Raphinha out against Getafe and Galatasaray
-
Djokovic crashes out of Shanghai Masters in his first match
-
MEXC and Payward Highlight Collaboration as Crypto and TradFi Converge at TOKEN2049
-
EU says Turkey's crackdown on rights hampers membership bid
-
EU states agree beefed-up European financial markets watchdog
-
Two Renoir paintings stolen in France recovered: mayor
-
Eritrea, Ethiopia trade barbs as Tigray rebels retreat
-
German leader outraged at Schroeder birthday visit to Putin
-
Kompany 'proud' of Man City success despite guilty verdict
-
Stocks up, oil retreats as Trump rules out pre-vote Iran attack
-
Man City will win appeal over financial charges, says Maresca
-
South African judge Navi Pillay wins Nobel Peace Prize
-
Fernandez logs record lap at Indonesia MotoGP practice
-
'I completely trust the club,' says Man City boss Maresca
-
Navi Pillay: S.Africa's global rights activist and Nobel winner
-
'10 out of 10' Quintana reminisces over dream Vuelta win
-
Ufunded Launches “Spotlight” Series, Documenting the Minds Shaping Modern Trading
-
Maddinson given shock recall but fails to score
-
Russell goes fastest in practice for smoggy Singapore GP
-
Navi Pillay, South African rights champion, wins Nobel Peace Prize
-
For exiled Russian director Zvyagintsev, triumph without belonging
-
Saudi Arabia says three killed at airport as Yemen war expands
-
Home hope Zheng storms into China Open semi-finals
-
Everton's US owners mull sale of club two years after takeover
-
Zverev churns out win in Shanghai Masters opener
-
Ukraine takes Russia fight to 'scorching sands' of Sahel
-
Hurricane Isaias strengthens en route to US Gulf Coast
-
Chinese AI tool pulled to prevent 'misuse' after South Korea hacks
-
US activists deploy poll volunteers over Trump intimidation fears
-
Asian stocks mostly up as traders weigh AI, oil dips after surge
-
Saint Laurent designer Vaccarello leaves after glittering decade
-
Walking through flames: orangutans rescued in Indonesia fires
-
'Tough to stay here': Nepal flood survivors wait for homes
-
LeBron shines in pre-season debut for re-tooled 76ers
Trump's order on nuclear testing: what we know
President Donald Trump has ignited a firestorm of controversy and confusion with his announcement that the United States will begin nuclear weapons testing.
It's unclear whether he was referring to testing weapons systems -- which the United States already does -- or actually conducting nuclear explosions, which only US arch-foe North Korea has carried out in the 21st century.
Below, AFP examines what Trump has said, the state of current US testing, and what it would take to resume explosive tests.
- What Trump said -
Trump said in a social media post that he had instructed the Defense Department "to start testing our Nuclear Weapons on an equal basis" with Russia and China.
However, neither of those countries are confirmed to have carried out recent explosive testing, and it is the Department of Energy that is responsible for the US nuclear stockpile.
The president subsequently told journalists on Air Force One that "they seem to all be doing nuclear testing," and that "we halted it many years ago but with others doing testing I think it is appropriate we do also."
He offered no details on the nature of the testing he had ordered.
- Current US testing -
The United States conducted the world's first nuclear test in July 1945 and used two nuclear weapons against Japan near the end of WWII.
It has carried out more than 1,000 explosive nuclear tests in total -- most recently in 1992 with a 20-kiloton underground detonation at the Nevada Nuclear Security Site.
That year, Congress passed a temporary moratorium on underground nuclear tests unless a foreign state conducted one, which has since occurred. Washington had already agreed not to conduct tests in the atmosphere, outer space and underwater as part of the Limited Test Ban Treaty, which it has been a party to since 1963.
The United States has also been a signatory since 1996 to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, which bans all atomic test explosions, but the Senate has yet to ratify it.
In the absence of explosive testing, the United States ensures its arsenal's reliability through the so-called Stockpile Stewardship Program, which includes "a wide range of scientific activities, from modeling and simulation to subcritical nuclear experiments," according to the US National Nuclear Security Administration.
"This program allows us to assess and certify the stockpile with extraordinary confidence," it says.
Washington also periodically tests its nuclear delivery systems such as intercontinental ballistic missiles.
The US military launched an unarmed Minuteman III missile earlier this year, with the Space Force saying at the time that the United States had carried out more than 300 similar tests overall.
- Resuming explosive testing -
The president has the authority to authorize explosive tests, and Washington's forces have "the capability to resume testing within 24-36 months of a presidential decision to do so," the US Congressional Research Service says.
It notes that a 2012 study found that "the response time for resuming underground explosive testing is driven more by compliance with environmental, health, and safety regulations than by the technical testing requirements or the need to restore equipment and facilities."
Doreen Horschig, a fellow with the Project on Nuclear Issues at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the US National Nuclear Security Administration would be able to "get the test site ready within six to 10 months for a very basic underground test."
"The timeframe is much longer if you want to test new warheads and new capabilities," Horschig said.
But she also noted that there is likely to be political opposition to a resumption of testing "from both sides of the political camps" in the United States, while "our allies (also) do not see a need for (a) return to testing."
D.Schneider--BTB