-
Ex-Spurs star Davids condemns 'lack of quality, lack of management'
-
Turkmenistan, the gas giant increasingly dependent on China
-
Romanian AI music sensation Lolita sparks racism debate
-
Timberwolves battle back to stun Nuggets in NBA playoffs
-
Eta appointment 'no surprise' for Union Berlin's ascendant women
-
Democrats eye Virginia gains in war with Trump over US voting map
-
Tourists trickle back to Kashmir, one year after deadly attack
-
Inside the world of ultra-luxury wedding cakes
-
Chinese AI circuit board maker soars on Hong Kong debut
-
Oil prices dip, most stocks rise on lingering Iran peace hopes
-
Tim Cook's time as Apple chief marked by profit absent awe
-
Mitchell, Harden shine as Cavs down Raptors for 2-0 series lead
-
El Salvador's missing thousands buried by official indifference
-
Trump's Fed chair pick to face lawmakers at key confirmation hearing
-
PGA Tour to scrap Hawaii opening events from 2027
-
Amazon invests another $5 bn in Anthropic
-
Israel PM vows 'harsh action' against soldier vandalising Jesus statue in Lebanon
-
Wembanyama wins NBA defensive player of the year
-
'The Devil Wears Prada 2' stars reunite for glamorous premiere
-
El Salvador holds mass trial of nearly 500 alleged gang members
-
Apple's Tim Cook to step down as CEO in September
-
West Ham's draw at Palace relegates Wolves, piles pressure on Spurs
-
Canadian tourist killed in Mexico archaeological site shooting
-
Wolves relegated from Premier League
-
Oil jumps on Hormuz tensions, stocks mostly retreat
-
Colombian environmental activist honored amid threats and exile
-
Gun battle traps more than 200 tourists at Rio viewpoint
-
Alcaraz may skip French Open rather than rush injury comeback
-
Top US court to hear case of Catholic schools excluded from state funding
-
Trump Fed chair pick to vow interest rate independence at key hearing
-
EU to host Taliban officials for talks on deporting Afghans
-
Blue Origin probing rocket's failure to deliver satellite
-
Pope blasts 'exploitation' as he wraps up tour of Angola
-
Wembanyama 'changing the game as we speak', says Nowitzki
-
Singer D4vd charged with murder after teen's body found in Tesla
-
Swiss football club turn down Kanye West concert approach
-
Leicester fairytale turns sour as relegation to third tier looms
-
Pope Leo blasts 'exploitation' as he wrap up tour of resource-rich Angola
-
Varma ton revives Mumbai's IPL hopes with win over Gujarat
-
Formula One makes rule changes after drivers' criticism
-
Singer D4vd charged with murder over teen's body found in Tesla
-
UK PM denies misleading MPs, says officials hid Mandelson info
-
Tit-for-tat blockades once again cripple traffic in Hormuz
-
Cafu says 2026 World Cup is perfect time for Brazil to win again
-
Erdogan vows new measures after deadly Turkey school shootings
-
Rose to take charge at Bournemouth after Iraola exit
-
Olympic status a massive 'boost' for squash says European champion Crouin
-
Kenyan double-double as Korir, Lokedi defend Boston Marathon crowns
-
Whale stranded on German coast swims off, gets stuck again
-
Iran pulling Hormuz 'lever' to maximum in US standoff
Trump's order on nuclear testing: what we know
President Donald Trump has ignited a firestorm of controversy and confusion with his announcement that the United States will begin nuclear weapons testing.
It's unclear whether he was referring to testing weapons systems -- which the United States already does -- or actually conducting nuclear explosions, which only US arch-foe North Korea has carried out in the 21st century.
Below, AFP examines what Trump has said, the state of current US testing, and what it would take to resume explosive tests.
- What Trump said -
Trump said in a social media post that he had instructed the Defense Department "to start testing our Nuclear Weapons on an equal basis" with Russia and China.
However, neither of those countries are confirmed to have carried out recent explosive testing, and it is the Department of Energy that is responsible for the US nuclear stockpile.
The president subsequently told journalists on Air Force One that "they seem to all be doing nuclear testing," and that "we halted it many years ago but with others doing testing I think it is appropriate we do also."
He offered no details on the nature of the testing he had ordered.
- Current US testing -
The United States conducted the world's first nuclear test in July 1945 and used two nuclear weapons against Japan near the end of WWII.
It has carried out more than 1,000 explosive nuclear tests in total -- most recently in 1992 with a 20-kiloton underground detonation at the Nevada Nuclear Security Site.
That year, Congress passed a temporary moratorium on underground nuclear tests unless a foreign state conducted one, which has since occurred. Washington had already agreed not to conduct tests in the atmosphere, outer space and underwater as part of the Limited Test Ban Treaty, which it has been a party to since 1963.
The United States has also been a signatory since 1996 to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, which bans all atomic test explosions, but the Senate has yet to ratify it.
In the absence of explosive testing, the United States ensures its arsenal's reliability through the so-called Stockpile Stewardship Program, which includes "a wide range of scientific activities, from modeling and simulation to subcritical nuclear experiments," according to the US National Nuclear Security Administration.
"This program allows us to assess and certify the stockpile with extraordinary confidence," it says.
Washington also periodically tests its nuclear delivery systems such as intercontinental ballistic missiles.
The US military launched an unarmed Minuteman III missile earlier this year, with the Space Force saying at the time that the United States had carried out more than 300 similar tests overall.
- Resuming explosive testing -
The president has the authority to authorize explosive tests, and Washington's forces have "the capability to resume testing within 24-36 months of a presidential decision to do so," the US Congressional Research Service says.
It notes that a 2012 study found that "the response time for resuming underground explosive testing is driven more by compliance with environmental, health, and safety regulations than by the technical testing requirements or the need to restore equipment and facilities."
Doreen Horschig, a fellow with the Project on Nuclear Issues at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the US National Nuclear Security Administration would be able to "get the test site ready within six to 10 months for a very basic underground test."
"The timeframe is much longer if you want to test new warheads and new capabilities," Horschig said.
But she also noted that there is likely to be political opposition to a resumption of testing "from both sides of the political camps" in the United States, while "our allies (also) do not see a need for (a) return to testing."
D.Schneider--BTB