-
How a Dostoevsky novella took TikTok by storm
-
Marathon man Zverev goes distance again to reach US Open third round
-
Zverev goes the distance again to reach US Open third round
-
US study tests psilocybin to fight cancer side effects
-
German AfD's love for Simson mopeds dismays Jewish family behind brand
-
Italy's Meloni throws party to celebrate record in power
-
Two trapped tunnel workers rescued in Nepal 'miracle'
-
After heatwaves, will EU pivot back to the climate fight?
-
Ex-Pakistan coach Gillespie tells Javed 'look in the mirror' over sackings
-
South Korean football referee faces hearing over 'period' insult
-
Monfils falls to Tien in US Open in Grand Slam farewell
-
Toulouse eye Top 14 history after 'difficult' summer
-
Arsenal brace for Chelsea test as Spurs seek spark
-
Springboks and All Blacks seek series lead after war of words
-
Efficient Rybakina reaches US Open third round
-
Bundesliga brings the band back together in Premier League's shadow
-
Taiwan boxer Lin considered 'graceful exit' after Paris Games gold
-
Asian stocks rally as traders pare rate bets ahead of jobs data
-
'I miss my home': Cambodians displaced by conflict start over
-
War-bruised Myanmar finds relief in bareknuckle bloodsport
-
Ailing Auger-Aliassime falls at US Open as Swiatek, Osaka and Gauff advance
-
Gauff downs Badosa to reach US Open third round
-
Tesla launches self-driving 'Cybercab' in Texas
-
New Zealand approves use of party drug MDMA to treat trauma
-
'Wallace & Gromit' creators turn 50 with spook-tacular Shaun yarn
-
Westerners test their mettle at World Nomad Games in Kyrgyzstan
-
New York's Muslims reclaim their city after 9/11 backlash
-
Gauff cruises into US Open third round
-
Premier League transfer windfall a lifeline for ailing French clubs
-
Kyrgios gets month ban for cocaine, enters treatment programme
-
Chile protesters see shades of Pinochet in new security plan
-
Colombian judge bans strikes on guerrillas if minors are present
-
Carreras reverts to fullback as Argentina change four for Australia Test
-
Khachanov shocks ailing Auger-Aliassime, Swiatek and Osaka advance at US Open
-
Wilson back to lead Australia as Kiss rotates team for Argentina
-
Lone juror blocking verdict in US mother's child murder trial: defense
-
Yen surges on new intervention talk, US stocks rally
-
'Kinda chic' - Williams sisters set to launch US Open doubles bid
-
Japan's Ueda fires Lille top of Ligue 1 on debut
-
Volkswagen says cutting 100,000 jobs by end of decade
-
Arsenal chief executive reveals 'dynasty' ambition
-
Russia slaps curfew on charity director over army criticism
-
Spanish PM says no 'solid proof' Morocco planned migrant rush
-
Ailing Auger-Aliassime upset by Khachanov at US Open
-
Iran war is not a war, US VP Vance says
-
Richarlison omitted from Tottenham's Premier League squad
-
Khachanov stuns third-seeded Auger-Aliassime in US Open second round
-
How El Nino is choking the Panama Canal
-
Bordeaux facing sixth-tier football after French federation upholds relegation
-
Hamilton drives his Ferrari dream at Monza
Republicans take aim at Biden with 'fact check' website
Just before Joe Biden announced his much-anticipated 2024 re-election bid Tuesday, his Republican opponents took aim at the US president in an unexpected way – they rolled out a website to "fact check" him.
The move underlines efforts on both sides of the political aisle to lob salvos at rivals using the fact-checking format, a move analysts say risks undermining trust in non-partisan debunkers of misinformation.
The Republican National Committee unveiled factcheckbiden.com, a website dedicated solely to exposing in real time what the party called the president's "lies."
"The RNC will continue to hold Biden accountable for his lies, and in November 2024, the American people will too," RNC chairwoman Ronna McDaniel said in a statement.
The website was launched just a day before Biden, a Democrat, threw his hat in the ring for a second presidential term, setting the stage for a possible rematch against Donald Trump.
Trump's Republican supporters promoted the website on social media as the "Biden White House's new least favorite website."
The site appeared to push Republican talking points, with a blizzard of posts mixing factual links with personal opinions -- something professional fact-checkers typically steer clear of.
Remarks made by Biden were flagged as "personal lies," "made up stories" and, in one instance, a "really, really weird lie."
"This sounds like a fairly standard campaign tactic, to set up a website to 'fact check' statements by your opponent," Joshua Tucker, co-director of the NYU Center for Social Media and Politics, told AFP.
"I doubt that mainstream media sources are going to confuse an RNC site fact-checking Biden for a non-partisan or professional fact checking site," Tucker added.
- 'Muddying the waters' -
The Republican move mirrors similar efforts by the Democrats.
The Democratic National Committee has established a "war room" that routinely sends out email newsletters with "fact-checks" or statements blasting Republican politicians.
During a presidential debate in 2016, in which Hillary Clinton was pitted against Trump, the Democrat's personal website ran a live "fact-check" of her opponent.
Clinton urged viewers of the debate to visit the segment called "Literally Trump" to witness the facts – a call that attracted millions of hits in a short span, according to US media.
Fact-checking by professional media organizations was a perpetually frenetic exercise during Trump's 2017 to 2021 presidency, when his every word and tweet – often riddled with inaccuracies – were heavily scrutinized.
Republicans appear to have "serious concerns" about the fairness of professional fact-checking organizations, according to a 2019 survey by the Pew Research Center. Seven in ten Republicans say fact-checkers tend to favor one side, compared with roughly three in ten Democrats, the survey said.
That likely explains the Republican push into debunking.
"The incorporation of 'fact-checking' language into clearly partisan activity could have the effect of muddying the waters on the trustworthiness -- and objectivity -- of non-partisan fact checking organizations," said Tucker.
"If 'fact checking' in some cases means 'this is our partisan opinion,' then it may become increasingly difficult to know when fact-checking really is a (neutral) activity."
B.Shevchenko--BTB