-
USA start World Cup bid with first game on home soil since 1994
-
SpaceX: Five key moments, from first launch to Starship megarocket
-
US clears Paramount's $111 bn Warner Bros. takeover
-
US deportation flight carrying Iranians lands in C.African Republic
-
Ohtani held out of Dodgers lineup with sore knee
-
Ancelotti warns Brazil can compete with anyone at World Cup
-
Wyatt-Hodge inspires England rout of Sri Lanka in Women's T20 World Cup opener
-
Venezuelan mining towns devoid of life after army operation
-
'Really cool' - Anunoby's low-key response to tip-in frenzy
-
Canada draw with Bosnia-Herzegovina to earn first ever World Cup point
-
What World Cup? New York gripped by Knicks frenzy
-
Iran and US say deal closer than ever
-
David Beckham gets Hollywood star as World Cup begins in US
-
Albanian PM rallies support as Trump-linked resort row festers
-
Spain are World Cup 'favourites' despite knockout woes, says Grimaldo
-
Boulter stuns Rybakina to reach Queen's Club semi-finals
-
After historic rally, Knicks aim to subdue Spurs early
-
When Hockney told AFP about his lockdown 'blessing' in France
-
In partial victory, Blake Lively wins legal fees from Justin Baldoni
-
Trump calls US World Cup team before first match
-
Partey refused entry to Canada for Ghana's World Cup opener
-
EU says to resume membership talks with Ukraine on Monday
-
'We're over it': Wemby says Spurs focused on game five after historic loss
-
Bruce Springsteen music center set to open in New Jersey
-
Cuba opens more sectors to private business
-
McTominay 'ready to go' for Scotland World Cup opener
-
Ghana World Cup player Partey, facing rape trial in UK, denied Canada visa: FIFA
-
Plane trouble delays pope's return after migrant-focused Spain visit
-
Canada's World Cup moment arrives at home
-
World's first gig economy treaty adopted at the ILO
-
Ireland-Israel football fixture to be played at neutral venue
-
World Cup struggles to ignite US excitement
-
US appellate court upholds Sam Bankman-Fried criminal sentence
-
Premier League changes hair-pulling punishment for new season
-
World amateur No.1 golfer Koivun to turn pro after US Open
-
McLaren's Norris pips Russell in second Barcelona F1 practice
-
Fans hope 'Orange Street' guides Dutch to World Cup victory
-
Florence's Giotto frescoes restored to glory after renovation
-
UK faces hard choices over military spending: analysts
-
Whole England squad must feel 'loved' at World Cup: Bellingham
-
Players welcome 'step forward' after Wimbledon prize money increase
-
Contemporary art giant David Hockney dies aged 88
-
France bids farewell to girl, 11, whose killing sparked outrage
-
Van Gils claims Auvergne Tour stage as Tuckwell moves into overall lead
-
Pele's 1958 World Cup winners' medal set to fetch £500,000
-
Ebola spreading into new areas in northeast DR Congo: WHO
-
African, Asian experts denied EU visas for major midwives summit
-
Kennedy Center board, Justice Dept appeal order to remove Trump's name
-
Former world champion Tsegay banned over doping violation
-
Wall Street wobbles as SpaceX shares launch, oil slides on Mideast deal hopes
The Iran war and the cost of killing 'bad guys'
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Thursday that it "takes money to kill bad guys" when asked if the Pentagon had requested $200 billion in funding for the Iran war.
Exactly how much the war has cost so far has yet to be publicly disclosed, and the final bill will depend on how long the US-Israeli campaign against Iran launched on February 28 lasts.
But it could be substantial: The Pentagon's comptroller reportedly told lawmakers that the first six days of the war had cost $11.3 billion.
That number sounds credible "based on the scope and scale of what the administration did during that period," said Daniel Schneiderman, director of global policy programs at Penn Washington.
"The amount of precision munitions and interceptors used, the number of air sorties, fuel expended, and cost of operation of two carrier strike groups all factored in, would lead to a very large bill," he said.
In an operation such as the one against Iran, the most crucial items are among the most expensive.
"Standoff weapons like cruise missiles, THAAD interceptors and batteries, bombs and missiles fired from aircraft, the fuel and maintenance that supports those aircraft and the carriers they fly off of, and not to mention the skilled labor that operates them," Schneiderman said.
- 'Volatile world' -
"It's very expensive to run a war," he said, noting that on a day-to-day basis, the Iran conflict "has to be up there with the costliest interventions the US has undertaken from a financial perspective."
Hegseth on Thursday indirectly confirmed the approximate value of the Pentagon's request for additional funding, saying: "As far as $200 billion, I think that number could move."
"We're going back to Congress and our folks there to ensure that we're properly funded for what's been done, for what we may have to do in the future, ensure that our ammunition is, everything's refilled," Hegseth said.
Trump also seemed to confirm the figure, saying when questioned about it that "we're asking for a lot of reasons, beyond even what we're talking about in Iran. This is a very volatile world."
"We want to have vast amounts of ammunition, which we have right now," Trump said during an event in the Oval Office. "It's a small price to pay to make sure that we stay tippy top."
In addition to the direct cost of the military equipment used during the war, the conflict has caused significant economic fallout in the form of soaring oil prices after Iran effectively closed the vital Strait of Hormuz waterway.
F.Müller--BTB