-
Long-serving Russian envoy to North Korea dies
-
Reddit says Australia's under-16 social media ban 'legally erroneous'
-
10 reported hurt after big Japan quake, warning of more tremors
-
Jimmy Kimmel extends late night contract for a year
-
Trump says US will allow sale of Nvidia AI chips to China
-
NBA fines Magic's Bane $35,000 for hurling ball at Anunoby
-
Pulisic quick-fire double sends AC Milan top of Serie A
-
Man Utd back on track after Fernandes inspires Wolves rout
-
Syria's Sharaa vows to promote coexistence, one year after Assad's ousting
-
World stocks mostly lower as markets await Fed decision
-
Palmer misses Chelsea's Champions League clash with Atalanta
-
Trump says Europe heading in 'bad directions'
-
Benin hunts soldiers behind failed coup
-
Salah a 'disgrace' for Liverpool outburst: Carragher
-
Peace deal at risk as DR Congo, Burundi slam Rwanda and M23 advances
-
Feminists outraged at video of French first lady's outburst against activists
-
Suspect arrested in theft of Matisse artworks in Brazil: officials
-
Troubled Liverpool host Barnsley in FA Cup third round
-
Slot has 'no clue' whether rebel star Salah has played last Liverpool game
-
Liverpool boss Slot says Salah relationship not broken
-
Powerful 7.6 quake strikes off Japan, tsunami warning lifted
-
100 abducted Nigerian children handed over to state officials
-
Lula orders road map to cut fossil-fuel use in Brazil
-
EU pushes back 2035 combustion-engine ban review to Dec. 16
-
Court will give decision in Sala compensation hearing on March 30
-
Mamdani to swap humble apartment for NY mayor's mansion
-
MSF says conditions for Gaza medics 'as hard as it's ever been' despite truce
-
Sala compensation hearing opens in Cardiff's dispute with Nantes
-
Syria's Sharaa vows to promote coexistence, reconciliation one year after Assad's ousting
-
Club Brugge sack coach in build up to Arsenal clash
-
US residents get free entry to national parks on Trump's birthday
-
Spurs looking into Bissouma conduct after 'laughing gas' report
-
Machado's mother says hopes daughter will collect Nobel in person
-
Salah dropped by Liverpool for Inter Milan clash after outburst
-
Boeing closes takeover of aviation supplier Spirit
-
Salah dropped by Liverpool for Inter Milan clash
-
Brazil police ID suspect in Matisse theft
-
Deal agreed to save Frankfurt's euro sculpture
-
Inter's Thuram braced for fightback from crisis-hit Liverpool
-
Trump says to sign order blocking AI regulation by states
-
Fracturing Real Madrid need Mbappe magic in Haaland showdown
-
13 inmates die in violence-plagued Ecuador prison
-
Paramount counters Netflix with hostile bid for Warner Bros
-
World stocks tread water with eyes on Fed
-
European allies back Zelensky after Trump criticism
-
'One Battle After Another' leads Golden Globes noms with nine
-
Tens of thousands celebrate as Syria marks one year since Assad's ouster
-
Meta to allow European users to share less data: EU
-
Three things to watch ahead of the 2026 F1 season
-
Zelensky meets European allies after Trump criticism
Australia ban offers test on social media harm
Australia's under-16 social media ban will make the nation a real-life laboratory on how best to tackle the technology's impact on young people, experts say.
Those in favour of the world-first December 10 ban point to a growing mass of studies that suggest too much time online takes a toll on teen wellbeing.
But opponents argue there is not enough hard proof to warrant the new legislation, which could do more harm than good.
Adolescent brains are still developing into the early 20s, said psychologist Amy Orben, who leads a digital mental health programme at the University of Cambridge.
A "huge amount" of observational research, often based on surveys, has tracked a correlation between teen tech use and worse mental health, she told AFP.
But it is hard to draw firm conclusions, because phones are so ingrained into daily life, and young people may turn to social media because they are already suffering.
"With technology, because it's changing so fast, the evidence base will always be uncertain," Orben said.
"What could change the dial are experimental studies or evaluations of natural experiments. So evaluating the Australia ban is hugely important because it actually gives us a window on what might be happening."
- No 'smoking gun' -
To try and shed light on the cause-and-effect relationship, Australian researchers are recruiting 13- to 16-year-olds for a "Connected Minds Study" to assess how the ban affects their wellbeing.
A World Health Organization survey last year found that 11 percent of adolescents struggled to control their use of social media.
Other research has shown a link between excessive social media use and poor sleep, body image, school performance and emotional distress, such as a 2019 study of US schoolchildren in JAMA Psychiatry that found those who spent over three hours a day on social media could be at heightened risk for mental health problems.
So some experts argue the right time to act is now.
"I actually don't think this is a science issue. This is a values issue," said Christian Heim, an Australian psychiatrist and clinical director of mental health.
"We're talking about things like cyberbullying, the risk of suicide, accessing sites on anorexia nervosa and self-harm," he told AFP.
Evidence of a risk is growing, Heim said -- pointing to a 2018 study by neuroscientist Christian Montag that linked addiction to the Chinese messaging app WeChat to shrinking grey matter volume in part of the brain.
"We can't wait for stronger evidence," Heim said.
Scott Griffiths of the Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences said a "smoking gun research study" was unlikely to emerge soon to prove the harms of social media.
But the ban was worth trying, he said.
"I'm hopeful that the major social media companies seeing this full-throated legislative action come into play will finally be motivated to more meaningfully protect the health and wellbeing of young people."
- 'Too blunt' -
More than three-quarters of Australian adults agreed with the new legislation before it passed, a poll indicated.
However, an open letter signed by more than 140 academics, campaigners and other experts cautioned that a ban would be "too blunt an instrument".
"People were saying: 'Well, kids are getting more anxious. There must be a reason -- let's ban social media'," argued one signatory, Axel Bruns, a digital media professor at Queensland University of Technology.
Children may simply have more reasons to be anxious, under pressure from pandemic-interrupted schooling and troubled by wars in Gaza and Ukraine, he told AFP.
And a ban might push some teens to more extreme, fringe sites, while preventing other marginalised young people from finding community.
Noelle Martin, an activist focused on image-based online abuse and deepfakes, feared the Australian ban would do little to help, given the country's history on enforcement of existing laws.
"I don't believe it will stop, prevent or do much to meaningfully combat this issue," Martin said.
In any case, the political decision has been taken in Australia.
"Social media is doing social harm to our children," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said this year.
"There is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms, so I'm calling time on it."
L.Dubois--BTB