-
World record-holders Walsh, Smith grab wins at US Open
-
Ukraine, US to meet for third day, agree 'real progress' depends on Russia
-
Double wicket strike as New Zealand eye victory over West Indies
-
Peace medal and YMCA: Trump steals the show at World Cup draw
-
NBA legend Jordan in court as NASCAR anti-trust case begins
-
How coaches reacted to 2026 World Cup draw
-
Glasgow down Sale as Stomers win at Bayonne in Champions Cup
-
Trump takes aim at Europe in new security strategy
-
Witness in South Africa justice-system crimes probe shot dead
-
Tuchel urges England not to get carried away plotting route to World Cup glory
-
Russian ambassador slams EU frozen assets plan for Ukraine
-
2026 World Cup draw is kind to favorites as Trump takes limelight
-
WHO chief upbeat on missing piece of pandemic treaty
-
US vaccine panel upends hepatitis B advice in latest Trump-era shift
-
Ancelotti says Brazil have 'difficult' World Cup group with Morocco
-
Kriecmayr wins weather-disrupted Beaver Creek super-G
-
Ghostwriters, polo shirts, and the fall of a landmark pesticide study
-
Mixed day for global stocks as market digest huge Netflix deal
-
Fighting erupts in DR Congo a day after peace deal signed
-
England boss Tuchel wary of 'surprise' in World Cup draw
-
10 university students die in Peru restaurant fire
-
'Sinners' tops Critics Choice nominations
-
Netflix's Warner Bros. acquisition sparks backlash
-
France probes mystery drone flight over nuclear sub base
-
Frank Gehry: five key works
-
US Supreme Court to weigh Trump bid to end birthright citizenship
-
Frank Gehry, master architect with a flair for drama, dead at 96
-
'It doesn't make sense': Trump wants to rename American football
-
A day after peace accord signed, shelling forces DRC locals to flee
-
Draw for 2026 World Cup kind to favorites as Trump takes center stage
-
Netflix to buy Warner Bros. in deal of the decade
-
US sanctions equate us with drug traffickers: ICC dep. prosecutor
-
Migration and crime fears loom over Chile's presidential runoff
-
French officer charged after police fracture woman's skull
-
Fresh data show US consumers still strained by inflation
-
Eurovision reels from boycotts over Israel
-
Trump takes centre stage as 2026 World Cup draw takes place
-
Trump all smiles as he wins FIFA's new peace prize
-
US panel votes to end recommending all newborns receive hepatitis B vaccine
-
Title favourite Norris reflects on 'positive' Abu Dhabi practice
-
Stocks consolidate as US inflation worries undermine Fed rate hopes
-
Volcanic eruptions may have brought Black Death to Europe
-
Arsenal the ultimate test for in-form Villa, says Emery
-
Emotions high, hope alive after Nigerian school abduction
-
Another original Hermes Birkin bag sells for $2.86 mn
-
11 million flock to Notre-Dame in year since rising from devastating fire
-
Gymnast Nemour lifts lid on 'humiliation, tears' on way to Olympic gold
-
Lebanon president says country does not want war with Israel
-
France takes anti-drone measures after flight over nuclear sub base
-
Signing up to DR Congo peace is one thing, delivery another
UK court hears latest Prince Harry libel suit against newspaper
A libel lawsuit brought by Prince Harry against one of Britain's biggest newspaper groups had its first court date Thursday in the latest legal action taken by the US-based royal.
The Duke of Sussex is suing Associated Newspapers -- which publishes the Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday and MailOnline -- over an article alleging he had sought to keep a request for British police protection under wraps.
The lawsuit relates to coverage in the Mail on Sunday and online of a separate court challenge he is pursuing against the UK government over his security arrangements when he is in Britain.
Harry, 37, and his wife Meghan Markle, 40, live in California after stepping down from royal duties in 2019, which caused them to lose their UK taxpayer-paid protection.
The prince's lawyer, Justin Rushbrooke, told the High Court in a written submission that the February article was "defamatory" because it suggested Harry had "lied" and "improperly and cynically" tried to manipulate public opinion over the issue.
Associated Newspapers' legal team is disputing that there was "any meaning defamatory" of him in its coverage.
In the legal claim against the government, the duke has appealed to the High Court for a review of the interior ministry's refusal to allow him to pay for police protection himself, arguing the decision means he cannot return home safely.
The government has dismissed the offer to pay for police protection as "irrelevant," writing to the court earlier this year that personal "security by the police is not available on a privately financed basis".
The cases come after the royal couple launched legal action in recent years against a number of publications, alleging invasion of privacy.
Markle won a long-running case against Associated Newspapers last year over the publication of a letter she wrote to her estranged father.
Judge Matthew Nicklin, who is hearing the new libel claim, will rule on a number of preliminary issues that he is considering following Thursday's hearing.
A.Gasser--BTB