-
Swiss wunderkind Manzambi scores 'childhood dream' brace
-
US faces tough path to new Iran nuclear deal
-
Good US Open shots not good enough for 2-over Scheffler
-
Cuba unveils historic package of free-market reforms
-
Subs send Swiss to World Cup rout of Bosnia-Herzegovina
-
Stokes set for England return in New Zealand finale - reports
-
McIlroy pleased with reduced green speeds in US Open winds
-
Quarantine over for almost all hantavirus ship passengers, crew
-
US stocks resume upward climb as dollar advances again after Fed outlook
-
Ex-presidents and stars, but no Trump, turn out for Obama Library
-
Stevens seizes US Open lead with McIlroy, Aberg one back
-
Al-Qaeda-linked jihadists attack Niger airport, 11 soldiers killed
-
'Big-game' Bellingham shows his worth for England at World Cup
-
New Zealand's Henry rocks England in 2nd Test after Phillips century
-
Vance warns Israel against criticizing US-Iran deal
-
Iran's supreme leader says approved deal as US lifts ports blockade
-
Australian qualifier Hijikata shocks Lehecka at Queen's Club
-
AI-generated videos use Down syndrome to make sales
-
O'Brien's royal century reward for sacrificing all for racing
-
Spurs sign Dutch defender Van Hecke from Brighton
-
England great Botham slams Stokes for breaking curfew
-
Liverpool agree deal to sign Spain forward Munoz from Osasuna
-
Chivu extends Inter deal until 2028 after debut season double triumph
-
New Zealand's Henry rocks England after Phillips century
-
Ghana pushes for concrete slavery reparations
-
Wildcard Eala shocks Rybakina in Berlin
-
Robertson and Scotland eye World Cup history against Morocco
-
South Africa hold Czechs, keep World Cup knockout dream alive
-
Joyful New York celebrates Knicks with ticker-tape parade
-
Important or selfish? World Cup evidence mounts against Ronaldo
-
Europe risks 'total irrelevance' without sovereign tech: Cohere chief
-
EU wrestles over tackling China export flood
-
Ex-presidents, stars, but no Trump, turn out for Obama Center
-
Vance defends Iran deal, eyes Swiss talks
-
US Olympic athlete Simpson shows 'improvement' after collasing on track
-
Wahi granted Canadian visa for Ivory Coast World Cup match after delay
-
Israel FM cuts contact with EU top diplomat over 'apartheid' remarks
-
US lifts Iran ports blockade as uncertainty clouds Swiss Iran talks
-
Brazilian police probe senator close to Lula
-
Brutal Shinnecock winds blow away US Open contenders
-
Leverkusen sign Portuguese talent Moreira from Lyon
-
AI-generated videos wield Down syndrome to make sales
-
Suspected jihadists stage deadly new attack on Niger airport
-
Man dies, trains and classes disrupted as heatwave hits France
-
Oil sinks on Mideast deal, but Fed outlook knocks equities
-
Neymar to miss Brazil's second World Cup game against Haiti
-
Dupont to start for Toulouse in Top 14 semi, Ramos out
-
O'Brien's historic 100th Royal Ascot winner has golden glow
-
Zverev wins all-German duel with Hanfmann to reach Halle quarters
-
Graft probe into Spanish ex-PM expanded to daughters
UK court hears latest Prince Harry libel suit against newspaper
A libel lawsuit brought by Prince Harry against one of Britain's biggest newspaper groups had its first court date Thursday in the latest legal action taken by the US-based royal.
The Duke of Sussex is suing Associated Newspapers -- which publishes the Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday and MailOnline -- over an article alleging he had sought to keep a request for British police protection under wraps.
The lawsuit relates to coverage in the Mail on Sunday and online of a separate court challenge he is pursuing against the UK government over his security arrangements when he is in Britain.
Harry, 37, and his wife Meghan Markle, 40, live in California after stepping down from royal duties in 2019, which caused them to lose their UK taxpayer-paid protection.
The prince's lawyer, Justin Rushbrooke, told the High Court in a written submission that the February article was "defamatory" because it suggested Harry had "lied" and "improperly and cynically" tried to manipulate public opinion over the issue.
Associated Newspapers' legal team is disputing that there was "any meaning defamatory" of him in its coverage.
In the legal claim against the government, the duke has appealed to the High Court for a review of the interior ministry's refusal to allow him to pay for police protection himself, arguing the decision means he cannot return home safely.
The government has dismissed the offer to pay for police protection as "irrelevant," writing to the court earlier this year that personal "security by the police is not available on a privately financed basis".
The cases come after the royal couple launched legal action in recent years against a number of publications, alleging invasion of privacy.
Markle won a long-running case against Associated Newspapers last year over the publication of a letter she wrote to her estranged father.
Judge Matthew Nicklin, who is hearing the new libel claim, will rule on a number of preliminary issues that he is considering following Thursday's hearing.
A.Gasser--BTB