-
Ice-cool Rybakina beats Sabalenka in tense Australian Open final
-
Pakistan attacks kill 15, dozens of militants dead: official
-
Ten security officials, 37 militants killed in SW Pakistan attacks: official
-
Epstein survivors say abusers 'remain hidden' after latest files release
-
'Full respect' for Djokovic but Nadal tips Alcaraz for Melbourne title
-
Wollaston goes back-to-back in the Cadel Evans road race
-
Women in ties return as feminism faces pushback
-
Ship ahoy! Prague's homeless find safe haven on river boat
-
Britain's Starmer ends China trip aimed at reset despite Trump warning
-
Carlos Alcaraz: rare tennis talent with shades of Federer
-
Novak Djokovic: divisive tennis great on brink of history
-
History beckons for Djokovic and Alcaraz in Australian Open final
-
Harrison, Skupski win Australian Open men's doubles title
-
Epstein offered ex-prince Andrew meeting with Russian woman: files
-
Jokic scores 31 to propel Nuggets over Clippers in injury return
-
Montreal studio rises from dark basement office to 'Stranger Things'
-
US government shuts down but quick resolution expected
-
Mertens and Zhang win Australian Open women's doubles title
-
Venezuelan interim president announces mass amnesty push
-
China factory activity loses steam in January
-
Melania Trump's atypical, divisive doc opens in theatres
-
Bad Bunny set for historic one-two punch at Grammys, Super Bowl
-
Five things to watch for on Grammys night Sunday
-
Venezuelan interim president proposes mass amnesty law
-
Rose stretches lead at Torrey Pines as Koepka makes cut
-
Online foes Trump, Petro set for White House face-to-face
-
Seattle Seahawks deny plans for post-Super Bowl sale
-
US Senate passes deal expected to shorten shutdown
-
'Misrepresent reality': AI-altered shooting image surfaces in US Senate
-
Thousands rally in Minneapolis as immigration anger boils
-
US judge blocks death penalty for alleged health CEO killer Mangione
-
Lens win to reclaim top spot in Ligue 1 from PSG
-
Gold, silver prices tumble as investors soothed by Trump Fed pick
-
Ko, Woad share lead at LPGA season opener
-
US Senate votes on funding deal - but shutdown still imminent
-
US charges prominent journalist after Minneapolis protest coverage
-
Trump expects Iran to seek deal to avoid US strikes
-
US Justice Dept releases documents, images, videos from Epstein files
-
Guterres warns UN risks 'imminent financial collapse'
-
NASA delays Moon mission over frigid weather
-
First competitors settle into Milan's Olympic village
-
Fela Kuti: first African to get Grammys Lifetime Achievement Award
-
Cubans queue for fuel as Trump issues oil ultimatum
-
'Schitt's Creek' star Catherine O'Hara dead at 71
-
Curran hat-trick seals 11 run DLS win for England over Sri Lanka
-
Cubans queue for fuel as Trump issues energy ultimatum
-
France rescues over 6,000 UK-bound Channel migrants in 2025
-
Surprise appointment Riera named Frankfurt coach
-
Maersk to take over Panama Canal port operations from HK firm
-
US arrests prominent journalist after Minneapolis protest coverage
Nobel physics laureate says Trump cuts will 'cripple' US research
It was just past 2:00 am when a mysterious number rang Nobel laureate John Clarke, what he deemed "obviously a joke call" that grew increasingly surreal when he heard "a voice from Sweden."
"It soon became clear that it was real," Clarke told journalists Tuesday after he and two colleagues had won the Nobel Prize in physics for their door-opening work in quantum mechanics.
"I was just sitting there feeling completely stunned," Clarke said. "It had never occurred to me in my entire life that anything like this would ever happen."
The University of California, Berkeley professor said his phone kept ringing, emails began pouring in, and people started "banging on my door" seeking interviews at 3:00 am (1000 GMT).
"I said no thank you, not at this time of night," the British 83-year-old said with a chuckle.
Clarke shared the coveted prize with two fellow physicists who worked in his Berkeley lab at the time of the trio's research, Frenchman Michel Devoret and American John Martinis. All three scientists are researchers at American universities.
The physicist noted the significant resources he was afforded at the time of their work some four decades ago, including lab space, graduate assistants and equipment.
And he called US President Donald Trump's efforts to reshape American science and health policy -- including mass firings to government scientists and steep slashes to research budgets -- an "immensely serious problem."
"This will cripple much of United States science research," he told AFP, adding that he knew people who have taken enormous funding hits.
"It is going to be disastrous if this continues," Clarke said. "Assuming that the present administration finally comes to an end, it may take a decade to get back to where we were, say, half a year ago."
"It's a huge problem" that's "entirely beyond any understanding of anyone who is a scientist," he said.
- 'Basic science' -
Nobel laureate Mary Brunkow, among Monday's winners for medicine, had similarly emphasized to journalists the importance of US public financing to scientific research.
This year's physics laureates carried out their experiments in the 1980s, research that enabled real-world applications of the quantum realm.
Quantum mechanics takes over when things get tiny -- think subatomic -- and the rules of traditional physics no longer apply.
For example, when a normal ball hits a wall, it bounces back. But on the quantum scale, a particle will actually pass straight through a comparable wall -- a phenomenon called "tunneling."
Clarke and his fellow winners demonstrated tunneling on a scale the public can grasp.
As the Nobel committee put it, their work showed "the bizarre properties of the quantum world can be made concrete in a system big enough to be held in the hand."
That research made possible technologies like the cell phone, and also proved foundational in the race to develop powerful quantum computers.
Clarke noted Tuesday that it is "vital" to keep conducting -- and funding -- work that might seem like "basic science" but results in "crucial applications" down the line.
"Michel and John and I had no way of understanding the importance" their work would have, he said.
"If you'd asked us 40 years ago, we would have said, 'Well yeah, it's an interesting thing.'"
He emphasized that researchers who lay the groundwork "are not that people who actually use that effect to do something that is vitally important."
"It's so important to do this basic science, because you don't know what the outcome is going to be."
I.Meyer--BTB