-
US regulators grant long-awaited Boeing 737 MAX 7 certificate
-
Israel objects to US-backed Gaza plan, defiant on pullout
-
Eala powers past Pegula for first WTA title in Washington
-
Norway's Haugset wins stage 3 to claim Tour de France Femmes lead
-
Legionnaires' outbreak in Switzerland's Basel kills one, 26 ill
-
Cuba slowly regains power after latest nationwide blackout
-
Infantino, the FIFA president under pressure after scrapped investor plan
-
Chelsea sign England midfielder Jordan Henderson
-
Young Danes start extended military service
-
Wildfire flares up again in Greece as water bombers deployed
-
England, Wales had driest July on record: Met Office
-
Greece wildfire expert says season 'one of the worst' in a decade
-
French court rejects pro-Kremlin commentator's deportation appeal
-
Sandoz strikes US settlements to resolve generic drug price dispute
-
Oil slides, stocks rise on hopes of deal to end Mideast war
-
Israel conveys 'concerns' to US on Gaza plan, keeps up strikes on territory
-
EU chief urges 'united action' on borders after Ceuta migrant rush
-
Inside Capital Regency's Market Expansion and User Acquisition
-
Oil prices slide on hopes of deal to end Mideast war
-
Israel conveys 'concerns' to US on Gaza plan and keeps striking
-
Dortmund sign Greek teenager Karetsas from Genk
-
Bangladesh measles outbreak drives families into debt: aid groups
-
Detained Aung San Suu Kyi meets Red Cross delegate in Myanmar
-
BitMart、説明を迫られる:SNC SCANDIC COINの出金は8日経っても依然としてTXIDなし
-
설명 압박에 직면한 BitMart: 8일이 지나도 여전히 TXID가 없는 SNC SCANDIC COIN 출금
-
Seoul issues first 'severe heatwave warning' under new system
-
BitMart تحت ضغط لتقديم توضيحات: عمليات سحب عملة SNC SCANDIC COIN لا تزال بدون معرّف المعاملة (TXID) بعد مرور ثمانية أيام
-
BitMart змушений надати пояснення: виплати в SNC SCANDIC COIN через вісім днів досі без TXID
-
Welsh FA withdraws support for Infantino's FIFA re-election bid
-
BitMart 面臨解釋壓力:SNC SCANDIC COIN 提現八天後仍無 TXID
-
BitMart under pressure to explain: SNC SCANDIC COIN withdrawals still without a TXID after eight days
-
Cycling superstar Pogacar to ride in Vuelta
-
Iran denies negotiating with US after Trump announces talks
-
Water bombers take to skies as Greece battles wildfires
-
What Europe can learn from Australia's 'Black Summer' wildfires
-
Training the UK 'surgeons of the future' using robots
-
Oil prices sink on Iran hopes, yen gains after joint intervention
-
US, Japan join forces to boost yen
-
Wildfires raze neighborhoods in US northwest city of Spokane
-
Survivors recall blasts before deadly Indonesian ferry fire
-
Trump attorney general pick says has reached deal with senators after standoff
-
Detained Suu Kyi meets Red Cross official in Myanmar: president office
-
Star Australian broadcaster faces trial for sexual assault
-
Cuba state energy firm reports new nationwide blackout
-
Oil prices sink on Middle East hopes, yen extends gains after joint intervention
-
US, Japan support yen with first joint intervention since 2011
-
Millions of Thais banish the booze for Buddhist Lent
-
Pegula leads Eala as storms push Washington Open finals to Monday
-
Returning to 'Ted Lasso' after break 'effortless': Hannah Waddingham
-
US dairy industry muscles up thanks to protein craze
Why go back to the Moon?
On September 12, 1962, then US president John F Kennedy informed the public of his plan to put a man on the Moon by the end of the decade.
It was the height of the Cold War and America needed a big victory to demonstrate its space superiority after the Soviet Union had launched the first satellite and put the first man in orbit.
"We choose to go to the Moon," Kennedy told 40,000 people at Rice University, "because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win."
Sixty years on, the United States is about to launch the first mission of its return program to the Moon, Artemis. But why repeat what has already been done?
Criticism has risen in recent years, for example from Apollo 11 astronaut Michael Collins, and the Mars Society founder Robert Zubrin, who have long advocated for America to go directly to Mars.
But NASA argues re-conquering the Moon is a must before a trip to the Red Planet. Here's why.
- Long space missions -
NASA wants to develop a sustainable human presence on the Moon, with missions lasting several weeks –- compared to just a few days for Apollo.
The goal: to better understand how to prepare for a multi-year round trip to Mars.
In deep space, radiation is much more intense and poses a real threat to health.
Low Earth Orbit, where the International Space Station (ISS) operates, is partly shielded from radiation by the Earth's magnetic field, which isn't the case on the Moon.
From the first Artemis mission, many experiments are planned to study the impact of this radiation on living organisms, and to assess the effectiveness of an anti-radiation vest.
What's more, while the ISS can often be resupplied, trips to the Moon -- a thousand times further -- are much more complex.
To avoid having to take everything with them, and to save costs, NASA wants to learn how to use the resources present on the surface.
In particular, water in the form of ice, which has been confirmed to exist on the lunar south pole, could be transformed into rocket fuel by cracking it into its separate hydrogen and oxygen atoms.
- Testing new gear -
NASA also wants to pilot on the Moon the technologies that will continue to evolve on Mars. First, new spacesuits for spacewalks.
Their design was entrusted to the company Axiom Space for the first mission which will land on the Moon, in 2025 at the earliest.
Other needs: vehicles -- both pressurized and unpressurized -- so that the astronauts can move around, as well as habitats.
Finally, for sustainable access to an energy source, NASA is working on the development of portable nuclear fission systems.
Solving any problems that arise will be much easier on the Moon, only a few days away, than on Mars, which can only be reached in at least several months.
- Establishing a waypoint -
A major pillar of the Artemis program is the construction of a space station in orbit around the Moon, called Gateway, which will serve as a relay before the trip to Mars.
All the necessary equipment can be sent there in "multiple launches," before finally being joined by the crew to set off on the long voyage, Sean Fuller, responsible for the Gateway program, told AFP.
"Kind of like you're stopping at your gas station to make sure you get all the stuff, and then you're off on your way."
- Maintaining leadership over China -
Apart from Mars, another reason put forward by the Americans for settling on the Moon is to do so before the Chinese, who plan to send taikonauts by the year 2030.
China is the United States' main competition today as the once proud Russian space program has withered.
"We don't want China suddenly getting there and saying, "This is our exclusive territory,'" NASA boss Bill Nelson said in a recent interview.
- For the sake of science -
While the Apollo missions brought back to Earth nearly 400 kilograms of lunar rock, new samples will make it possible to further deepen our knowledge of this celestial object and its formation.
"The samples that we collected during the Apollo missions changed the way we view our solar system," astronaut Jessica Meir told AFP. "I think we can expect that from the Artemis program as well."
She expects further scientific and technological breakthroughs too, just like during the Apollo era.
B.Shevchenko--BTB